Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HORUS PRESENTS: WHY NoW???

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by koboy View Post
    Can 40-0 from 106 - 154 be considered circumstantial evidence?
    Does Floyd have any problems submitting himself to OST's to prove "you" wrong?

    Comment


    • Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
      Talk boxing.

      Wheres the proof?
      Talk boxing and then you say "Where's the proof?"

      Comment


      • Originally posted by koboy View Post
        Talk boxing and then you say "Where's the proof?"

        Show me how Pac is innocent. I'll wait.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
          Show me how Pac is innocent. I'll wait.
          Show me how he is guilty.

          To hell wit all that side talk!

          Show me he is guilty!!!!!

          If not, you, and everyone else needs to stop the bull****.

          Stop implying (you know you are)...

          Comment


          • Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
            Show me how Pac is innocent. I'll wait.
            BTW:

            If you have no proof, please rest your case....Thanks in advance.

            Comment


            • Well this has been a very predictable 15 page adventure presented by Horus.

              It seems Manny is until proven 100% innocent he is other wise a doper based on all of this "evidence" that what a surprise does not exist in any way shape or form other than in the imagination of coincidentally the same place this thread came from(Horus).

              What did you think was going to happen in this thread Horus?

              Did you think you were going to sway anyone's view with long paragraphs and empty rhetoric based on no foundation really?

              Do you think having a dictionary and thesaurus for the purpose of buying a vowel so to speak makes you clever?

              I know what you are doing here talking in circles using a bunch of expensive terms because I used to do it all of the time in sociology and psychology classes when I really didn't have a leg to stand on in debates.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by HandSpeed303 View Post
                Show me how he is guilty.

                To hell wit all that side talk!

                Show me he is guilty!!!!!

                If not, you, and everyone else needs to stop the bull****.

                Stop implying (you know you are)...
                I dont have any proof to show hes guilty.

                Now do me a favor and show me how he is innocent.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by No Ceilings View Post
                  Show me how Pac is innocent. I'll wait.
                  Keith Kizer, the executive director of the Nevada Athletic Commission, says there is no evidence Pacquiao is using steroids. Nevada rules, which have been in place since 2002, require fighters to submit urine samples before every fight. Those samples are tested for 40 kinds of steroids, diuretics and masking agents. Pacquiao, who has fought in Las Vegas 10 times since '02, has never tested positive. Pacquiao's conditioning coach, Alex Ariza, says the only substances Pacquiao took leading up to the fight were whey protein and liver-support supplements, while consuming a 6,500-calories-per-day diet.

                  Comment


                  • Does mayweather send you a cheque or cash?

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Spray_resistant View Post
                      Well this has been a very predictable 15 page adventure presented by Horus.

                      It seems Manny is until proven 100% innocent he is other wise a doper based on all of this "evidence" that what a surprise does not exist in any way shape or form other than in the imagination of coincidentally the same place this thread came from(Horus).

                      What did you think was going to happen in this thread Horus?

                      Did you think you were going to sway anyone's view with long paragraphs and empty rhetoric based on no foundation really?

                      Do you think having a dictionary and thesaurus for the purpose of buying a vowel so to speak makes you clever?

                      I know what you are doing here talking in circles using a bunch of expensive terms because I used to do it all of the time in sociology and psychology classes when I really didn't have a leg to stand on in debates.

                      He couldnt provide a single circumstantial evidence or hard evidence that pac was using steroids......


                      he tried to play perry mason trying to sway NSB with some lawyeristic jingo gibberish instead ended up looking like anthony mason's haircut.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP