Who has a greater legacy, Joe Calzaghe or Ronald Wright?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bigchill79
    Interim Champion
    • Jul 2004
    • 730
    • 13
    • 0
    • 6,847

    #91
    Originally posted by AKATheMack
    I think Winkys 2 wins over Mosely are better than any 2 wins Joe has.
    Werent Winky always considered freakishly big @ Light Middle.

    Comment

    • IMDAZED
      Fair but Firm
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2006
      • 42644
      • 1,134
      • 1,770
      • 67,152

      #92
      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
      Your rewarding Joe for having a less checkered career but the problem there is he has a less checkered career because he was not fighting elite fighters.

      Imagine if Shane Mosley had not fought Wink,Forrest and stayed a LW beating the likes of Holiday, Leija etc, how highly would your rank him now? he would still be the same fighter capable of losing to Wink,Forrest but you would be overvaluing him because his career record would not be as checkered by losses. Basically Shane would not be any greater but you would perceive him greater because his record looks tidy with solid wins.


      Mosley,Wink,DLH,Holyfield etc have losses because they had more questions asked of their credentials because they fought the elite, Joe did not have to answer those questions, thats why there are so many question marks about his career. We know how good these guys were because we saw the fight the very best.

      The only difference between Hamed/Hatton/Calzaghe is that the aforementioned fought elite fighters when they were in their prime whilst Joe did not.
      I agree with much of what you're saying. But, that said, I STILL don't believe Ronald "Winky" Wright should be placed higher than Joe. At all. And I've yet to hear an argument FOR him.

      Comment

      • Dirk Diggler UK
        Deleted
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 48836
        • 1,312
        • 693
        • 58,902

        #93
        Originally posted by IMDAZED
        I agree with much of what you're saying. But, that said, I STILL don't believe Ronald "Winky" Wright should be placed higher than Joe. At all. And I've yet to hear an argument FOR him.
        He's trying his best.

        Comment

        • IMDAZED
          Fair but Firm
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • May 2006
          • 42644
          • 1,134
          • 1,770
          • 67,152

          #94
          Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
          So you dont think Trinidad was elite ?

          Quartey you could argue but you have to take into account that Quartey clearly should of got decisions over DLH & Vernon Forrest.

          Its all about who the opponent has beaten or perceived to have beaten in Quartey's case. Dont poo poo that either because we all know Whitaker did not draw with Chavez but he still got mad props like he actually did win.
          Trinidad wasn't elite when Winky beat him but it was an upset.

          Comment

          • Dynamite Kid
            Slicker than your average
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2007
            • 20701
            • 627
            • 209
            • 38,291

            #95
            Originally posted by IMDAZED
            I agree with much of what you're saying. But, that said, I STILL don't believe Ronald "Winky" Wright should be placed higher than Joe. At all. And I've yet to hear an argument FOR him.
            Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
            He's trying his best.
            I dont need to try. I know Calzaghe was not capable of beating an elite fighter, his solid unspectacular resume is just a smoke screen to how good he actually was.

            Its good that he had a solid career rather than of gone for a spectacular career because he was not good enough to enhance his resume beyond that point, thats why he never stepped in the ring with elite fighters in their prime.

            Comment

            • Kris Silver
              Kneel 4 Silver,good boy!
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 7798
              • 1,073
              • 3,581
              • 27,245

              #96
              Originally posted by IMDAZED
              I agree with much of what you're saying. But, that said, I STILL don't believe Ronald "Winky" Wright should be placed higher than Joe. At all. And I've yet to hear an argument FOR him.
              It's simple.

              He likes him.

              He dislikes the other guy.

              He like a lot of people, has serious sympathy for fighters whom for whatever reason manage to face more 'elite names', and go to war leading to exaggerations of how good they really were despite picking up a good few losses.

              Someone mentioning Oscar De La Hoya was spot on.

              Comment

              • Steven Adams
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Jan 2010
                • 2264
                • 99
                • 170
                • 8,996

                #97
                2 wins over mosely > 2 wins over 40+ year olds.

                Comment

                • Dynamite Kid
                  Slicker than your average
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2007
                  • 20701
                  • 627
                  • 209
                  • 38,291

                  #98
                  Originally posted by IMDAZED
                  Trinidad wasn't elite when Winky beat him but it was an upset.


                  I think he was. Tito was well capable of beating other very good LMW imo.

                  He was not at his peak but he was still elite. Something would have to restrict you from performing to that level not to make elite anymore, like aged reflexes, being shot, Tito was none of that, he was not in bad condition and look tremendous against Mayorga.

                  A question, does a prime Tito still have stylistic problems with Wink? i think so.

                  Comment

                  • hammerhiem
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • May 2008
                    • 4877
                    • 129
                    • 102
                    • 11,163

                    #99
                    Claiming Winky has a better legacy than Calzaghe is like me say hatton has a better legacy than SSM.

                    all it would accomplish is making me look ******.

                    Comment

                    • IMDAZED
                      Fair but Firm
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • May 2006
                      • 42644
                      • 1,134
                      • 1,770
                      • 67,152

                      #100
                      Originally posted by Dynamite Kid
                      I think he was. Tito was well capable of beating other very good LMW imo.

                      He was not at his peak but he was still elite. Something would have to restrict you from performing to that level not to make elite anymore, like aged reflexes, being shot, Tito was none of that, he was not in bad condition and look tremendous against Mayorga.

                      A question, does a prime Tito still have stylistic problems with Wink? i think so.
                      What proof is there of this? Because he beat Mayorga? That's a stretch.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP