Who has a greater legacy, Joe Calzaghe or Ronald Wright?

[pasawayako]

is calzaghe the one who had been knock down against roy jones and hopkins?

[B u r n e r]

Calzaghe isnt even close to Winky Wright.

[tanibanana]

Calzaghe.. like a 117-111 UD Win...

[pasawayako]

it has to be wright, calzaghe doesn't have a resume to be proud of its just his undefeated record, he is just like jcc jr.

[pelonxsoldier28]

i can't see how anyone can say big joe has a better resume. winky fought p-will, b-hop, quartey, taylor, trinidad, mosley twice, hernandez, vargas, mckart 3 times. joe fought jones, b-hop, kessler, manfredo , bika, lacy. might i add jones and b-hop are way past their primes and still manage to knock joe on his ass. there really isn't an argument to be had. winky takes this hands down.

[rochemback]

Winky.
Fighting the best and beating Mosley (twice) and Trinidad counts more than holding a title over years against way worse fighters and beating two old legends at the end of his career. Way more actually.

In fact, that comparison is a perfect example of how overrated the 0 in the losses column can be.

[wazaa.]

Ronald Wright.

[Pirao]

mosley x2 and trinidad - both with much more left than hopkins, roy had nothing left so he doesnt even count.

also i think the BHop-winky decision couldve gon eighter way, but BHop beat calzaghe clearly.

also quartey, and most think winky beat vargas (i do anyways).

winkys resume is way better, the only argument for calzaghe is that he was undefeated.

I see you have a reasonable and unbiased opinion there.

[BritishBoxing92]

Ronald Wright.

your just saying that coz u dont like Calzaghe lol

[theghost#1]

Calzaghe easy. Joe never lost a fight.