Manny Pacquiao is greater then Pernell Whitaker - Bert Sugar

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • wizard king
    Banned
    • May 2009
    • 1846
    • 113
    • 79
    • 2,052

    #111
    Originally posted by baracuda
    so which one is greater many or only one?.......cmon you can do it
    dont get all mad cause not every one thinks your hero is the greatest of all time and suck on this as well *****

    Comment

    • NYU Alum.
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Nov 2009
      • 963
      • 24
      • 1
      • 1,241

      #112
      Originally posted by wizard king
      what a moron i needed a good laugh go watch mma cause that is the only thing you can understand, i wont even waist my time talking to you afther this you would be to retared to get it and suck on this *****
      Answer the question, *d*ot!

      Comment

      • Calilloyd
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2009
        • 4373
        • 124
        • 292
        • 10,868

        #113
        Originally posted by Hank$Moody
        Pound for pound best HW doesn't mean best HW.

        Are you really not getting this?
        Ok genius, explain what it means then? This should be good.

        Comment

        • Jim Jeffries
          rugged individualist
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Oct 2007
          • 20740
          • 1,376
          • 2,868
          • 54,838

          #114
          Originally posted by Calilloyd
          Ok genius, explain what it means then? This should be good.
          Well for one it means he is taking into account Dempsey's diminutive size.

          One could say Hank Armstrong was a greater pound for pound WW than Tommy Hearns. But he's not a greater or better WW overall.
          Last edited by Jim Jeffries; 11-26-2009, 03:57 PM.

          Comment

          • pelonxsoldier28
            EL GRAN CAMPION MEXICANO
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • May 2006
            • 2689
            • 145
            • 36
            • 9,289

            #115
            Originally posted by X89
            I also think Pacquiao is ahead of Whitaker...but if they fought, prime vs. prime, Whitaker beats him.

            Just my opinion.
            i'd have to agree. and how can you really compare resumes when they are from different eras? there was someone on here that posted a comparison in resumes and left out a whole lot more good fighters on sweet peas.

            Comment

            • baracuda
              Banned
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Mar 2009
              • 10779
              • 259
              • 569
              • 11,470

              #116
              Originally posted by wizard king
              dont get all mad cause not every one thinks your hero is the greatest of all time and suck on this as well *****
              lol....why would i be mad when bert sugar (the one that matters in history books)is the one giving pac praises?......youre the one who seem mad coz you cant do something about it....

              Comment

              • Calilloyd
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Nov 2009
                • 4373
                • 124
                • 292
                • 10,868

                #117
                Originally posted by Hank$Moody
                Well for one it means he is taking into account Dempsey's diminutive size.
                You didn't answer the question just as I knew you wouldn't. I'm done wasting my time. Sugar rated Dempsey as the best heavyweight ever. Get over it.

                Comment

                • Jim Jeffries
                  rugged individualist
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Oct 2007
                  • 20740
                  • 1,376
                  • 2,868
                  • 54,838

                  #118
                  Originally posted by Calilloyd
                  You didn't answer the question just as I knew you wouldn't. I'm done wasting my time. Sugar rated Dempsey as the best heavyweight ever. Get over it.
                  Not when he has two HWs ranked above him on his 100 greatest fighters list, sorry kid.

                  You also have to understand that when Sugar ranks "greatness," he factors in things like "impact on the sport." Dempsey pretty much single-handedly put boxing on the map.
                  Last edited by Jim Jeffries; 11-26-2009, 03:49 PM.

                  Comment

                  • baracuda
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 10779
                    • 259
                    • 569
                    • 11,470

                    #119
                    Originally posted by pelonxsoldier28
                    i'd have to agree. and how can you really compare resumes when they are from different eras? there was someone on here that posted a comparison in resumes and left out a whole lot more good fighters on sweet peas.
                    how else would you compare the two if not by their resumes dumb dumb?...lol

                    Comment

                    • Sin City
                      la mala vida
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Nov 2006
                      • 27551
                      • 1,757
                      • 2,208
                      • 47,596

                      #120
                      Originally posted by Bhopereign
                      sweetpea much better when it come to defense
                      he wasnt talking about defense was he? he was talking about who is the better fighter.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP