Comments Thread For: Reynoso Confident Canelo's Legacy Won't Be Defined By Not Fighting Benavidez

[BodyBagz]

Just ignore that Fake British Scumbag, he hates Americans and Mexicans cuz probably a person from both of the groups must have drilled his momma or girl LOL that's why I put that crackhead junkie on ignore

Great idea

[hhh1200]

It won't because Benavidez will do nothing at 175. I only have him favored over Gvoz because Beterbiev mentally broke Gvoz for 3 years ago so he will fold under pressure. That's why the fight is being made like putting Andrade in a shoe box ring. Benavidez can't beat the loser of Beter/Bivol. His team will pick up a vacated belt.

[Haka]

Bottom line the reason why I never liked Canelo is that his career has always been full of these antics. Picking on worn out fighters, clenbuterol, ducking, gift decisions, having the biggest weight cut at 154. And now hiding under the bed when a a bigger 168 fighter than can fight shows up.

[Sid-Knee]

Your getting put on ignore you Dumb And delusional junkie

You mean you can't answer simple questions because the answers are not to your liking so you want to run away. OK. That proves my argument quite clearly.

[Sid-Knee]

I've indulged you out of sheer curiosity because I've observed that you have the worst reputation on this site. After a bit of back and forth I've come to understand why your reputation is what it is. Nobody is afraid of you, they just get exhausted trying to reason with a ret.ard. I have encountered fermented cat shi.ts that reason better than you. Go take your pill.

My "Reputation" is built on having people deflect like you're doing because i asked them difficult questions.

If Canelo didn't haver a career out of making sure his opponents were at their weakest before fighting them, they'd have no problem naming the ones he beat without any kind of robbery or stipulation being attached. But no, you just can't do it and instead throw ad hominem attacks around. Thinking some questions are delusional when they're clearly not, is in fact, an act of delusion on your part. Ironic really. So is thinking that your replies are "Reasoned" to some simple questions. All a load of irony.

Well, point proven. I'd be the same if i was delusional and was a fanboy of a corrupt cheating coward. But i'm not. So i don't run into the same problems you do. But thanks for your precise and rational responses. It was great discussing something simple with an intellectual like yourself. It's not often that happens here. Mostly is just a bunch of imbeciles who completely f3ck themselves over in a heap of ironic madness.

See you around.

[Sid-Knee]

Last year he died suddenly. Check the lounge. There is a sticky about it.

that asswipe war room was stalking him online for some reason. Came across an obituary on his Facebook page.

Damn. I didn't know this. Yeah, may he rest in peace. He was a decent fella actually.

[Sid-Knee]

I dont play that answering a question with a question game.
A fighter who is so loved should have a better resume than the guy who is hated.

Fans just want the fight. That's it. One is willing while the other isn't. Only people who are not right in the head would attack the one who wants to fight and come up with any insane fallacy to justify it not happening.

[Sid-Knee]

Just ignore that Fake British Scumbag, he hates Americans and Mexicans cuz probably a person from both of the groups must have drilled his momma or girl LOL that's why I put that crackhead junkie on ignore

I'm a fake Brit? Where do you think i come from then if i'm faking being a Brit?

I've got to be honest, that's a new one on me. But there is someone who does go around faking being a Brit. He goes by the name "Oldskool". You don't happen to know him do you? Hmmm.

[Sid-Knee]

Bottom line the reason why I never liked Canelo is that his career has always been full of these antics. Picking on worn out fighters, clenbuterol, ducking, gift decisions, having the biggest weight cut at 154. And now hiding under the bed when a a bigger 168 fighter than can fight shows up.

Don't say that. You'll be accused of being a crackhead.

Say after me... "Canelo is the greatest fighter and man there has ever been. Where would we be without him".

Now, i bet you feel so much better now? It's always better when it's "King" Canelo.

[TheOneAboveAll]

My "Reputation" is built on having people deflect like you're doing because i asked them difficult questions.

If Canelo didn't haver a career out of making sure his opponents were at their weakest before fighting them, they'd have no problem naming the ones he beat without any kind of robbery or stipulation being attached. But no, you just can't do it and instead throw ad hominem attacks around. Thinking some questions are delusional when they're clearly not, is in fact, an act of delusion on your part. Ironic really. So is thinking that your replies are "Reasoned" to some simple questions. All a load of irony.

Well, point proven. I'd be the same if i was delusional and was a fanboy of a corrupt cheating coward. But i'm not. So i don't run into the same problems you do. But thanks for your precise and rational responses. It was great discussing something simple with an intellectual like yourself. It's not often that happens here. Mostly is just a bunch of imbeciles who completely f3ck themselves over in a heap of ironic madness.

See you around.

I'm happy to engage anyone in rational debate, but if you're going to insist that I am the one who deflects and evades questions, then you really must respond to my direct questions yourself, instead of completely disregarding valid points and then repeating your same question that I already addressed. Otherwise, it all becomes a waste of time. Most importantly, we must stay on a focused topic. Drifting and perpetually modifying the issue (or outright strawmanning my arguments) is exasperating and exhausting. I try to keep an open mind and accept that there are different and valid viewpoints, style preferences, etc, but too often I find myself engaging with people who insist that their own bizarre, biased speculations are 'facts' or who flippantly dismiss the achievements of objectively elite fighters.

I'm not any kind of fanboy of Canelo's (I've criticized him plenty), but neither am I blind to what he's achieved. Canelo's resume is widely regarded as the best in the sport by knowledgeable fans. That means it compares favorably to every other active fighter in the sport. He has fought more champions than anyone else, and every other opponent since he became champion has been a top 10 contender or better. Your silly and endless 'write me a list' game isn't something that I'm going to indulge. You seem to believe that just because you don't like the order in which he fought his opponents or that an opponent of his moved up or down in weight, or that his opponent had a recent poor performance then that means Canelo's career is a fraud. Well, then that means everyone in this sport is a fraud. As I've said to many other people on this forum who look to discredit accomplished fighters, if you are inclined to find asterisks in ANY fighter's resume, you will find them. There is always some wrinkle, some issue to criticize. That's the life of the miserable critic.