Comments Thread For: Reynoso Confident Canelo's Legacy Won't Be Defined By Not Fighting Benavidez
Collapse
-
-
Time to start calling Alvarez "Cereza".Comment
-
Comment
-
He dropped his belt rather than fight Franco, dropped his belt rather than fight Ioka, turned down the fight with Ioka after Ioka beat Franco. He's stuck now though, because Ioka is there at 115 with him, and Nakatani just moved up to 118. So he's got to take on the 112 lb Bam Rodriguez instead, although we know Bam is the goods at 115 also. I think he'd have the best shot against Ioka, personally, but he clearly doesn't. He wouldn't have beaten Naoya Inoue either. I think he'd have been knocked out by Naoya if they had fought. He gets stopped or decisioned wide by Nakatani. Dunno what happens with Ioka or Bam. But he's got a long history of turning down big fights against risky opposition, and a lot of wins by split or majority decision against his best opponents.
Comment
-
Well, in HIS opinion, apparently, it's Ioka. He's ducked that fight at least 3 times. Like, vacated belts and fled to another division, turned down money offers to fight nobodies, etc. You don't find it suspect that he's only fought one lone unification across all his title reigns, and that was for the biggest payday of his life vs Chocolatito in the second fight? 14 title fights, only one unification.
He dropped his belt rather than fight Franco, dropped his belt rather than fight Ioka, turned down the fight with Ioka after Ioka beat Franco. He's stuck now though, because Ioka is there at 115 with him, and Nakatani just moved up to 118. So he's got to take on the 112 lb Bam Rodriguez instead, although we know Bam is the goods at 115 also. I think he'd have the best shot against Ioka, personally, but he clearly doesn't. He wouldn't have beaten Naoya Inoue either. I think he'd have been knocked out by Naoya if they had fought. He gets stopped or decisioned wide by Nakatani. Dunno what happens with Ioka or Bam. But he's got a long history of turning down big fights against risky opposition, and a lot of wins by split or majority decision against his best opponents.
Comment
-
I know the thread you're talking about, but you didn't own anything. What did you own me on? Your delusional fantasies? Point it out specifically on what point you owned me on? It's news to me.Comment
-
Apart from size all of those other advantages you list are subjective. The same claims could be made about virtually any fighter. I think it’s a reasonable to cite instances where Canelo manipulated a catchweight or imposed a rehydration clause, or said his opponent had to wear two left shoes. Outside of stuff like that all the rest is b******t whining.
No one is a great by going after inactive opponents all the time. No one is great by fighting much smaller opponents. No one is great by fighting shot fighters. No one is great for getting robberies. Only cowards would make a career out of it. Canelo is the worst though for doing this. You've got Davis and Munguia and the likes. But Canelo is being called a great and a HOF'er. He's neither.
Now stop deflecting all the time and list these world class wins that make him supposedly great? You're insecure for a reason. Even your excuse of it not being exclusive to Canelo is pathetic. Which other great has ever done anything like this? List their names too.Comment
-
Refute the facts if you can. But you can't. That's your problem. Most boxing fans know Canelo is a fraud. There's a reason to why.Comment
-
Oh don't worry, i know the level of extreme they go to. I've seen it all over the place. It's a bit too hard to miss it.Comment
-
I also didn't know you had to have a better resume than the fighter you want to fight. Maybe tell boxing fans that as they clearly want Canelo vs Benavidez. Funny that isn't it. But you continue with the trolling and the strawmen arguments. You seem to like doing both of those.Comment
Comment