Originally posted by Regge
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
If Canelo Beats Beanvidez he's clearly the best 168 of all time
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
Ok but Hopkins has never fought at 168 so how could you possibly rank him ahead of Canelo at 168?
Second point, again makes no sense. If that’s the standard for “whipped” then Hopkins got whipped twice by Jermain Taylor, amongst others.
He fought professionally for another ELEVEN YEARS. That in itself was amazing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post
When Hopkins fought Taylor he was FORTY. So………..
He fought professionally for another ELEVEN YEARS. That in itself was amazing.
He hasn’t even left Middleweight at that point and you’re saying he should be ranked ahead of Canelo at Super Middleweight?
There is zero logic to your argument.
Comment
-
[QUOTE=IronDanHamza;n32096032
He hasn’t even left Middleweight at that point and you’re saying he should be ranked ahead of Canelo at Super Middleweight?
There is zero logic to your argument.[/QUOTE]
And??? I don’t work off what people spoon feed me like you. I make the judgment myself. Hopkins never had an amateur career.
He lost his first fight and at the point he met Taylor was 46:2. Second loss was RJJ. That’s great to me. I think prime RJJ and Calzaghe are better though.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MONGOOSE66 View Post
And??? I don’t work off what people spoon feed me like you. I make the judgment myself. Hopkins never had an amateur career.
He lost his first fight and at the point he met Taylor was 46:2. Second loss was RJJ. That’s great to me. I think prime RJJ and Calzaghe are better though.
You are using loss’s against Canelo but are making excuses for Hopkins losing twice to Jermain Taylor. It works both ways.
It’s irrelevant what you think is great or not. Hopkins never even fought at Super Middleweight so how could anyone with any ounce of logic possibly rank him ahead of Canelo at that weight?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cypocryphy View Post
He lost to Golovkin twice. Vegas robbed Golovkin. I think that really hurts his claim to be a top 20 let alone the very best.
Not every fight that's super close is a robbery. faking' hurts the sport when ppl propagate this ******ity
Comment
-
Originally posted by ramses07 View Post
look man this gets so annoying, I get it, he should've lost to GGG the firs time, but the second time could've gone either way.
Not every fight that's super close is a robbery. faking' hurts the sport when ppl propagate this ******ity
Actually, you know what, I have something for you. A thread on here that was made a little while ago. I think you'll find it illuminating. The link is here. You might just find it interesting because it demonstrates a new technology superior to what's being used today, and it will be used next year.
Comment
-
Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
Yes, as in, what is your point?
You are using loss’s against Canelo but are making excuses for Hopkins losing twice to Jermain Taylor. It works both ways.
It’s irrelevant what you think is great or not. Hopkins never even fought at Super Middleweight so how could anyone with any ounce of logic possibly rank him ahead of Canelo at that weight?
Comment
-
Comment