Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Team Usyk Promoter On Latest Delay For Fury Fight: If A Fighter Is Not Willing To Go, You Cannot Make Him

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #51
    Originally posted by LAchargers373 View Post

    Are u upset that I stated all facts? Also crappyuk isn’t very bright. Yes u can force someone to fight. Fury tried to bypass wilder and go Str8 into an AJ fight but wilder sued him to force the 3rd fight. Crappyuk knows this but he likes to stunt on Twitter pumping false info. What he means to say is: “Tyson fury is the a-side in this fight we have to when he’s ready. Tysons promoter is paying us life changing money so waiting another 6-8 weeks isn’t an issue”
    these guys are made for Twitter
    So . . . you're a child? Got it.
    greeneye99 greeneye99 likes this.

    Comment


    • #52
      Also, let's point out that Tyson's promoter isn't paying anything. This is being funded by the Saudis, and Fury is potentially looking at being sued by them for 200 million pounds. So Usyk's team saying they'll be flexible if he can meet the contractual requirements proving injury really only helps him avoid the penalty his big mouth and cherry pick gone wrong earned him.

      Comment


      • #53
        Originally posted by AmpMcv View Post

        So . . . you're a child? Got it.
        Haha u must be broke. Learn basic economics before u start calling people names lol. Dossers like u fill up the nosebleed sections loser

        Comment


        • #54
          Originally posted by crimsonfalcon07 View Post
          Also, let's point out that Tyson's promoter isn't paying anything. This is being funded by the Saudis, and Fury is potentially looking at being sued by them for 200 million pounds. So Usyk's team saying they'll be flexible if he can meet the contractual requirements proving injury really only helps him avoid the penalty his big mouth and cherry pick gone wrong earned him.
          Sure bud. The Saudis are ready to sue fury for 200 million pounds? U must have the best source. It sounds pretty authentic. I’m starting to believe this totally. All u dossers just don’t get it lol. When people
          make real money they really don’t give af what bums like you and the other broke fury haters think. Wahhh fury said this and that and cherry picked a fight for 50M wahhhhhh. Saudis gonna sue him now? bwahahaha I’ve never heard such a dumb proposition in my life. The fight just isn’t gonna happen when usyk or his fans want. Sorry cry about it. Guess what tho? Usyk doesn’t care either. Wanna know why? BASIC ECONOMICS. All the usyk suckers cried and cried and are still crying even tho usyk making more than twice as much as the AJ fights. BASIC ECONOMICS. Can’t teach the ******ly of some u dumbasses lol usyk will make huge money that’s why he’ll wait and everyone and their dog knows this except his dumbass manager Crappyuk and his dumbass fans who think he’s some unstoppable force even tho he fu kin lost to chisora and Bredis ROFL
          Last edited by LAchargers373; 11-07-2023, 04:34 AM.

          Comment


          • #55
            Originally posted by crimsonfalcon07 View Post

            Here's what you said in that article about him saying he had injuries. That's the only thing you said there.



            Here's what you said in the article about Usyk's team asking Fury to furnish proof of injury to move the date:



            ​Here's what you said when Fury said that Usyk had to fight on December 23rd or else:



            When Fury said it had to be done December 23, or else, you said it would be Usyk's fault if the fight didn't happen.

            When Usyk said he was injured, you said you didn't trust he wanted the fight and implied the failure of the first fight was on Usyk.

            When Usyk's team said Fury needed to furnish proof of injury, you said it would be Usyk's fault if the fight didn't happen.

            Now you're pretending you didn't know about the injury point when you commented in the thread to try to blame Usyk.

            Keep lying. This is all your own words.
            I didn’t know there was injury on Usyk’s side. Now that’s come to light then if Fury wouldn’t budge on the date then that would be him at fault.

            But is there an injury or not? You said it’s fake news so which one is it?

            It is very very very simple.

            If Usyk was injured, and Fury doesn’t budge on the date by a month - Fury’s fault.

            If Fury is bashed up from his fight with Ngannou and Usyk doesn’t budge on the date by a month - Usyk’s fault.

            It’s incredibly simple.

            You on the other hand blame Fury for both scenarios.

            You are so inconsistent on the matter that one minute you say Usyk is injured therefore the date should be moved then call it fake news in the next post to suit your narrative.

            For you to call someone else biased is laughable.

            Comment


            • #56
              Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
              More games and nonsense.

              Usyk said prior to the Ngannou fight that December 23rd isn’t ideal because of lingering injuries and now apparently it’s that date or no fight.

              Its pathetic but no one’s going to call them out on it.
              Usyk never said that. It was fake news, based on a bad translation of something Usyk said in an interview in Ukraine.


              Comment


              • #57
                Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post



                Then that point you’ve referred to there, that was before I knew he had lingering injuries. To which you’re now saying is “fake news” so which one is it? Did he say he can’t do 23rd due to injuries or did he not? Because if he did then that’s just further games.


                No, he didn't say that.

                He was reported as saying that, but he and his promoter both denied those reports and said that there were no problems and Usyk would be ready to fight on 23rd December.
                greeneye99 greeneye99 likes this.

                Comment


                • #58
                  Originally posted by kafkod View Post

                  No, he didn't say that.

                  He was reported as saying that, but he and his promoter both denied those reports and said that there were no problems and Usyk would be ready to fight on 23rd December.
                  Thanks for clarifying.

                  Posters in this thread seem to want to use that when it suits them and then call it fake news when it doesn’t.
                  kafkod kafkod likes this.

                  Comment


                  • #59
                    I just want to point something out that deals with lineal. If lineal interests you, read on, if not, **** off.


                    Y'all know how folks say lineal is the title going back to Sully and the traditions boxing followed prior to sanctioning bodies right?

                    Youse have also heard those who contend a lineal can be stripped for inactivity, drugs, by Ring, and I'm sure others that range from believable to absolutely ******, right?

                    You guys know the rule of 1-2 right? Where the highest rated man fights the second highest rated man to become lineal?


                    There is of course tradition prior to bodies, that's true, but there is no precedence for stripping a lineal for drugs or inactivity, and ring and rating didn't exist in the 1880s, but stripping a lineal champion because he refuses to fight the man the public wants him to fight, there is precedence for, actually. Putting lineal on the line for that man the public wants to see fight for lineal but the current lineal refuses, there is precedence for.


                    So, I am not saying Usyk is or isn't or should or shouldn't, but there is argument for it.
                    kafkod kafkod likes this.

                    Comment


                    • #60
                      Originally posted by Marchegiano View Post
                      I just want to point something out that deals with lineal. If lineal interests you, read on, if not, **** off.


                      Y'all know how folks say lineal is the title going back to Sully and the traditions boxing followed prior to sanctioning bodies right?

                      Youse have also heard those who contend a lineal can be stripped for inactivity, drugs, by Ring, and I'm sure others that range from believable to absolutely ******, right?

                      You guys know the rule of 1-2 right? Where the highest rated man fights the second highest rated man to become lineal?


                      There is of course tradition prior to bodies, that's true, but there is no precedence for stripping a lineal for drugs or inactivity, and ring and rating didn't exist in the 1880s, but stripping a lineal champion because he refuses to fight the man the public wants him to fight, there is precedence for, actually. Putting lineal on the line for that man the public wants to see fight for lineal but the current lineal refuses, there is precedence for.


                      So, I am not saying Usyk is or isn't or should or shouldn't, but there is argument for it.
                      Lineal is a dubious concept anyway. The real lineage ended with Lennox Lewis' retirement. But even that was passed under less than au****ious circumstances when Holmes beat the corpse of Ali for it. It's not really a "title" but a debatable distinction with subjective criteria for establishing a new one. The current heavyweight lineage was established when Klitschko beat Chagaev and neither the WBC or WBA titles were contested that night.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP