Wiil Usyk drop a belt to avoid Hrgovic?

[Smash]

Krasuk said we want 50-50, Fury wants more, but we accept 60-40, as long as the winner gets 60.

How do you not see the implication there?

"We initially agreed for 50/50," he continued, "But then Tyson was asking for some bigger money.

"So we made it clear that we are ready to go 60/40, but the winner takes 60.

fury wants 'bigger money', what is 'bigger money'? that could be 70%, krasuk could simply be saying we want 60% to the winner, thats our offer, not a counter off to a 60 40 offer by fury that noone anywhere has mentioned at all, so where is this warren quote then?

[IronDanHamza]

"We initially agreed for 50/50," he continued, "But then Tyson was asking for some bigger money.

"So we made it clear that we are ready to go 60/40, but the winner takes 60.

fury wants 'bigger money', what is 'bigger money'? that could be 70%, krasuk could simply be saying we want 60% to the winner, thats our offer, not a counter off to a 60 40 offer by fury that noone anywhere has mentioned at all, so where is this warren quote then?

Sounds like 60-40 doesn’t it?

If he wants “bigger money� than 50% and they then say they accept 60-40 but only if the winner gets 60 that sounds like 60.

Trying to find Warren quote but can’t. Think it was on Talksport but I’m not sure.

It’s neither here nor there anyway, Usyk’s 60 to the winner was a bogus offer and nothing but media spin. Why aren’t we acknowledging that?

[Smash]

Sounds like 60-40 doesnât it?

no........

if that offer was made there would be evidence of it, there is zero evidence of it

there is lots of evidence of a 70 30 split demanded by fury

zero evidence of 40% offer by fury to usyk rejected by usyk

[IronDanHamza]

no........

if that offer was made there would be evidence of it, there is zero evidence of it

there is lots of evidence of a 70 30 split demanded by fury

zero evidence of 40% offer by fury to usyk rejected by usyk

Fair enough.

Whats your thoughts on the 60-40 but the winner gets 60 offer made by Usyk?

[Dr. Z]

no........

if that offer was made there would be evidence of it, there is zero evidence of it

there is lots of evidence of a 70 30 split demanded by fury

zero evidence of 40% offer by fury to usyk rejected by usyk

Smash via TKO over IronDan.

[IronDanHamza]

Smash via TKO over IronDan.

Not really.

It’s a good back and forth and good dialogue.

He makes a good point about the 60-40. I thought it was in writing but it seems it’s not.

[Smash]

Fair enough.

Whats your thoughts on the 60-40 but the winner gets 60 offer made by Usyk?

Thats a bad offer for fury who would never accept it

Fury is the A side and will obviously get a bigger split in the UK

Its a pity that fury didnt actually offer that 40% you were going on about

That would have really put it up to usyk as it is a fair offer

If usyk rejected a flat 40% we would have heard all about it & i think u must also know that fury would have twisted the knife if that was rejected, there would be plenty of evidence of that offer rejected right from the rantings of fury and the scorn of warren of a fair deal rejected flat out

[IronDanHamza]

Thats a bad offer for fury who would never accept it

Fury is the A side and will obviously get a bigger split in the UK

Its a pity that fury didnt actually offer that 40% you were going on about

That would have really put it up to usyk as it is a fair offer

If usyk rejected a flat 40% we would have heard all about it & i think u must also know that fury would have twisted the knife if that was rejected, there would be plenty of evidence of that offer rejected right from the rantings of fury and the scorn of warren of a fair deal rejected flat out

Not only is it a bad offer, it’s not a real offer.

Why isn’t that talked about?

I was under the understanding that 40% was offered by I may be wrong on that and willing to concede that as I haven’t found anything after searching.

[Smash]

Not only is it a bad offer, it’s not a real offer.

Why isn’t that talked about?

I was under the understanding that 40% was offered by I may be wrong on that and willing to concede that as I haven’t found anything after searching.

well i think usyk would love that offer, guaranteed 40% with a possibility of 60% for a win, its pie in the sky offer as he knows it would never be accepted by fury

im afraid fury coming out and demanding 70% put an end to the whole thing i would say, that was not a reasonable thing to do

on to saudi part II is the only answer

[IronDanHamza]

well i think usyk would love that offer, guaranteed 40% with a possibility of 60% for a win, its pie in the sky offer as he knows it would never be accepted by fury

im afraid fury coming out and demanding 70% put an end to the whole thing i would say, that was not a reasonable thing to do

on to saudi part II is the only answer

Exactly, it would never be accepted and they were very aware of that. Just like Fury’s 70-30. And that “acceptance” was bogus aswell.

So they’re both playing games. Why isn’t Usyk under fire for that?