Originally posted by Oregonian
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Alexis Rocha Embraces Possibility of Facing Terence Crawford Next
Collapse
-
Originally posted by fumiphobic View Post
Keep on fooling yourselves and keep enabling a guy who got 31 fights on his record yet still waiting, waiting, waiting for Christmas to happen for him. Crawford was approached by BLK, Frank Warren and now GBP. While this Ennis guy who keeps yapping about how he wants the Crawford fight in a heartbeat does nothing.
Boots is not a belt holder. You are comparing a guy with no belt with a guy that won a belt over 5 years ago and has fought ZERO names except for Porter who was coming off a Spence loss anyway.
I don’t hear you say shít about Ortiz Jr, or even Rocha who has a loss on his record. You are literally praising Rocha because he “dares to be great”. You are shiïtting on Spence and Boots JUST because we are calling out Crawford.
The logic of casuals is astonishing. Talk about Whataboutism syndrome!
Rebelrbg likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rebelrbg View Post
No, I wasn't defending him, just the opposite, I was pointing out to his defenders how ridiculous that is, and that he's, Bud, is looking like a coward.
Apologies! My grammar is falling apart. I didn’t mean YOU. I meant to write THEY
I already you and I are on the same page so that wasn’t directed at you at all.
Bud is a coward and it’s ok to be afraid. What is not ok is for idiots to defend a coward using some retárded logic.
Rebelrbg likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post——-
Apologies! My grammar is falling apart. I didn’t mean YOU. I meant to write THEY
I already you and I are on the same page so that wasn’t directed at you at all.
Bud is a coward and it’s ok to be afraid. What is not ok is for idiots to defend a coward using some retárded logic.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rebelrbg View Post
Brook and Porter were both in their prime. Brook got stopped at 160 because he was chasing greatness, as you guys like to say for Cinnabon. He challenged GGG, the fighter no one wanted to face in that division, and moved 2 weight classes up to fight him. There's a huge difference between 160 and 147. Before the GGG fight Brook was undefeated, and by the time Spence fought him in 2017, Brook was the IBF champion and Ring magazine ranked him as the top welterweight in the world.
Porter was the WBC champion and only had one loss to Thurman when Spence fought him. When Crawford fought them, they both were on their last lap before retirement. Spence fought the 3 current champions and took their straps, and former champions, there's no comparison.
Unfortunately he took heavy damage and in the end couldn’t continue. Only about 8 months later and more than 10 pounds lighter, after having a metal plate put in his face to hold things together, he was in the ring again facing Errol Spence. You are trying to sell this version of Brook as a great win for Spence. I don’t see how anyone is supposed to buy this.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 4truth View Post
I admire your dedication. Brook muscled up two weight classes and looked for all the world like he might pull off the upset. Dared to be great, absolutely!
Unfortunately he took heavy damage and in the end couldn’t continue. Only about 8 months later and more than 10 pounds lighter, after having a metal plate put in his face to hold things together, he was in the ring again facing Errol Spence. You are trying to sell this version of Brook as a great win for Spence. I don’t see how anyone is supposed to buy this.
That may be so, the reality is, Brook held a belt and being belt holder gives you leverage so Spence went to the UK to get the belt.
It is exactly the same thing with Crawford’s fringe belt. Crawford beat Jeff Horn who LOST to Pacqiao and let’s face it, Horn is no where close to Brook. Horn is a flash in a pan kind of boxer that will be forgotten.
All things being equal, Spence proceeded to unify three belts at WW. Only one belt left. The only fight to make is Spence vs Crawford.
It does not happen. The next best option is Boots or Ortiz. Crawford knows this and to be fair Spence knows this as well.
Crawford goes on to face Avanesyan. We knew how that fight would play out. Crawford is back, the best option is still Boots or Ortiz, Crawford is now looking at Rocha.
Now, when will Crawford fight Boots or Ortiz. Those are the two top WW contenders. Crawford has said he’ll fight three times this year so there is no reason to duck those guys.
This argument cannot be refuted with Spence Whataboutism.I say the same thing about Spence. He should fight Boots NOT Thurman.
Do you see the difference here? I’m not defending Spence.
Crawford has a history of fighting guys like Khan, Brook, Avanesyan, now Rocha and perhaps Broner after. Spence is one belt from unifying the WW division.
When you guys talk about Crawford’s achievements, you always talk about the unification at 140. Why not give the same accolades to Spence? I see toxic and misplaced hate
Rebelrbg likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post——-
Hopefully Crawford will give Broner and then Brandon Rios an “opportunity and experience too, so they can carry that into future fights”.
Those would be great fights too
Comment
-
Originally posted by Oregonian View Post———-
That may be so, the reality is, Brook held a belt and being belt holder gives you leverage so Spence went to the UK to get the belt.
It is exactly the same thing with Crawford’s fringe belt. Crawford beat Jeff Horn who LOST to Pacqiao and let’s face it, Horn is no where close to Brook. Horn is a flash in a pan kind of boxer that will be forgotten.
All things being equal, Spence proceeded to unify three belts at WW. Only one belt left. The only fight to make is Spence vs Crawford.
It does not happen. The next best option is Boots or Ortiz. Crawford knows this and to be fair Spence knows this as well.
Crawford goes on to face Avanesyan. We knew how that fight would play out. Crawford is back, the best option is still Boots or Ortiz, Crawford is now looking at Rocha.
Now, when will Crawford fight Boots or Ortiz. Those are the two top WW contenders. Crawford has said he’ll fight three times this year so there is no reason to duck those guys.
This argument cannot be refuted with Spence Whataboutism.I say the same thing about Spence. He should fight Boots NOT Thurman.
Do you see the difference here? I’m not defending Spence.
Crawford has a history of fighting guys like Khan, Brook, Avanesyan, now Rocha and perhaps Broner after. Spence is one belt from unifying the WW division.
When you guys talk about Crawford’s achievements, you always talk about the unification at 140. Why not give the same accolades to Spence? I see toxic and misplaced hate
Comment
-
Originally posted by Griever0730 View Post
Yea. Only difference with the sarcastic joke you made is that the 2 guys you named are already long past their best days, have been tested against top fighters and already showed what they are fully capable of in those situations. Rocha is still in his prime hasn't been in that situation yet. This is about Rocha being inexperienced, not you knocking Crawford and his resume like most of the pom-pom holders on here.
In that case, let’s use your very logic - Spence (or Boots) should fight Cody Crowley. He is 21-0 and is in the top 10 WW ranking. What do you think of that fight?
Let’s give it context, I had no idea who Crowley was until I googled ESPN ranking. It was the same with Avanesyan and Rocha.
This and of course, fighting Brook and Khan compounds and boxing purist to knock on Crawford’s resume.
One more context, prior to the failed drug test, Connor Benn was in the top 10 WW, what would your reaction be if Spence fought him? Would it be the same reaction if it was Crawford who fought him? See where I’m getting at?
Rebelrbg likes this.
- Likes 1
Comment
Comment