Floyd Mayweather Avoided Everyone Who Had A Physical Advantage Over Him ... Genius or Fraudster?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Aren't you the same dude who tried to justify Floyd not weight bullying Marquez in the early 2000's with a recent flabby picture of himComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
"You mean that version of Cotto that was 2 fights removed from the brutal Marg fight, and was drained at a catchweight...and a Hatton that already got knocked out by Floyd?"
Thats your s**t right?
Oh I guess when all else fails, Floyd still beat a past prime version of Manny.
You can't make this s**t upLast edited by djtmal; 11-21-2022, 07:04 PM.Comment
-
Same responses I see, its all you got at the end of the day with everyone who slaps you with facts, you've run your race and lost badly now you're just a heckler at the back of hall singing abuse to everybody up front, its gotten old and your crying is drying up.Comment
-
This is technically true but it's also due to his dimensions, which he can't help. I can't fault Fury for being bigger and faster than most of his foes. He's just using what he was born with. Same with Fundora using his massive height advantage over his opponents.
Mayweather is 67.5" with 72" reach. Most of the welterweights during Floyd's time were actually shorter than him, but physically bigger. Almost all of them were slower with shorter reach and most coaches, like Breadman etc, will tell you reach is much more important than height.
I actually wonder how he would have fared against Ray Leonard - just as fast, harder hitter, taller, more reach, Crawford - bigger, more power, more reach, and Spence - bigger, taller, same reach.Comment
-
This is technically true but it's also due to his dimensions, which he can't help. I can't fault Fury for being bigger and faster than most of his foes. He's just using what he was born with. Same with Fundora using his massive height advantage over his opponents.
Mayweather is 67.5" with 72" reach. Most of the welterweights during Floyd's time were actually shorter than him, but physically bigger. Almost all of them were slower with shorter reach and most coaches, like Breadman etc, will tell you reach is much more important than height.
I actually wonder how he would have fared against Ray Leonard - just as fast, harder hitter, taller, more reach, Crawford - bigger, more power, more reach, and Spence - bigger, taller, same reach.
Ali
Roy
& Mike Tyson
Why didn't Ali, Roy, or Mike fight an opponent more athletic than themComment
Comment