Why do Canelo fans get so combative when someone says GGG won both fights
Collapse
-
I guarantee most of the people claiming Canelo won didn't even score the fights. They just like Canelo and they're inclined to give the decision to anyone that managed to last the distance with GGG.
I don't understand how anyone who knows boxing, at all. Anyone who has watched 100 or so, or more, boxing fights - can say that Canelo deserved anything more than two 8-4 type losses in those 2 fights.
It's honestly hilarious and crazy to me that people really get on here and try and make the claim that Canelo won one of those, or both!! Of those fights lol. Just crazy
Just like all the cowards claiming robbery for the Fulton vs Figueroa fight (I scored it a draw). They all said who they "felt" won the fight but they didn't post scorecards during the fight, they didn't post scorecards before the decision was read. They just yelled afterwards.
GGG vs Jacobs: 7-5 GGG plus a knockdown
GGG vs Canelo: 8-4 GGG
GGG vs Canelo II: 7-5 GGG
GGG vs Derevyanchenko 6-6 with the knockdown edging the fight to GGGComment
-
What did Atlas get banned from? The weekly Canelo clubhouse meetings?
But that's not what you originally said? You said GGG CLEARLY WON 8 rounds to 4 BOTH fights. And a lot of ppl INCLUDING the JUDGES had Canelo winning the 2nd fight.
Go Google what Roy Jones said after the fight? Google what Charlo and Spence said about ggg.
Atlas says crazy, ****** sht all the time. And why he got banned.Comment
-
So you can claim that professional tv commentators have an "agenda" and won't give Golovkin a fair shake?
But Canelo fans aren't allowed to claim that YOU have an agenda and won't give Canelo a fair shake?
You're full of double standards.
They come out every time you insist that there's only one acceptable way to score these fights...your way.Comment
-
Sorry but I don't care about the opinion of a man who has the picture like that of another man as their avatar. Like, how soft are you dude. Probably a little sweet too. We aren't the same bud.Comment
-
Get over what? I don't care about the official cards. I don't care about ****** opinions on here.
My thread was asking why the little Canela girls get so upset when someone matter of factly says that GGG won both fights. It's pretty obvious that he did. It certainly is a very reasonable take.
You should be telling them to get over it, and move on. Go work on that.Comment
-
I could see someone saying Sergei was a robbery - in the sense that he never had a chance of winning a fight like that on the cards. it was a close fight but I could see an argument for that.
Jacobs, I wonder what all those people would say if Jacobs and GGG fought the opposite fight of each other.
I bet they would have had Jacobs winning 10-2 or 11-1 in that case. That tells me all I need to know....Comment
-
yep that's pretty much how I had those too. Shaded one more to GGG in the Jacobs/Canelo 2nd fight, but otherwise exactly how I had those fights.
I guarantee most of the people claiming Canelo won didn't even score the fights. They just like Canelo and they're inclined to give the decision to anyone that managed to last the distance with GGG.
Just like all the cowards claiming robbery for the Fulton vs Figueroa fight (I scored it a draw). They all said who they "felt" won the fight but they didn't post scorecards during the fight, they didn't post scorecards before the decision was read. They just yelled afterwards.
GGG vs Jacobs: 7-5 GGG plus a knockdown
GGG vs Canelo: 8-4 GGG
GGG vs Canelo II: 7-5 GGG
GGG vs Derevyanchenko 6-6 with the knockdown edging the fight to GGG
If you're actually scoring round by round, it's hard to miss all the work GGG does/did. He is incredibly active and always scoring. His jab is a great punch, not some little dainty jab.
But yeah, you're right, I doubt most are actually scoring it. And those that do, they can see what they want to see.Comment
-
We'd certainly have a lot better cards if that were the case.
So you can claim that professional tv commentators have an "agenda" and won't give Golovkin a fair shake?
But Canelo fans aren't allowed to claim that YOU have an agenda and won't give Canelo a fair shake?
You're full of double standards.
They come out every time you insist that there's only one acceptable way to score these fights...your way.
The key to pointing out an agenda, is focusing on the opinions someone has overall about a fight or fighter. Simply saying a comment about who won a fight, or what you think of a fighter, is not necessarily indicative of having an agenda.
However, when you notice a pattern, or notice certain comments for or against a fighter. Then yes you can then form an opinion as far as whether someone has an agenda.
It's obvious as to why Mexican TV commentators would overhype someone's performance vs GGG.
It's not quite as obvious for you probably as to why the UK commentators would overhype someone's performance vs GGG, but they have an obvious pro UK.US/anti Russian sentiment over there. Not surprising they would overhype a performance where all someone did was survive and go 12 rounds, and lose an 8-4 type of fight.Comment
Comment