Why do Canelo fans get so combative when someone says GGG won both fights
Collapse
-
-
Wow, so UK tv commentators are anti-Russian and that's why they had Danny Jacobs beating the Kazakh Golovkin?
We'd certainly have a lot better cards if that were the case.
The key to pointing out an agenda, is focusing on the opinions someone has overall about a fight or fighter. Simply saying a comment about who won a fight, or what you think of a fighter, is not necessarily indicative of having an agenda.
However, when you notice a pattern, or notice certain comments for or against a fighter. Then yes you can then form an opinion as far as whether someone has an agenda.
It's obvious as to why Mexican TV commentators would overhype someone's performance vs GGG.
It's not quite as obvious for you probably as to why the UK commentators would overhype someone's performance vs GGG, but they have an obvious pro UK.US/anti Russian sentiment over there. Not surprising they would overhype a performance where all someone did was survive and go 12 rounds, and lose an 8-4 type of fight.
Do you have any proof of them showing any anti-Russian bias before?
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Are you really asking about a history or UK-Russia relations? I would think you would be well aware of the cold war that has gone on between the two of them over the past 6 or so decades.
Not to mention that UK commentators generally don't know sh.it about boxing. Look at the fighters they overhype for crying out loud. They hardly know their elbow from their *******.Comment
-
why should we care about your opinion then?? what part of that do you not understand?Comment
-
because he didnt win both fights..thats your OPINION..not sure why you think your opinion is worth more then others but it isnt
Get over what? I don't care about the official cards. I don't care about ****** opinions on here.
My thread was asking why the little Canela girls get so upset when someone matter of factly says that GGG won both fights. It's pretty obvious that he did. It certainly is a very reasonable take.
You should be telling them to get over it, and move on. Go work on that.Comment
-
So you should change your opinion about something because others are arguing against it? lol
It's funny because that's exactly what people want to do on this site. They want to argue their (knowingly false) points loudly enough and often enough to try and move the needle and drown out the actual truth of it.
So yeah, I'll stick to giving my opinion when it's relevant.Comment
-
I know how to score fights. And I use this on how I score.
I guarantee most of the people claiming Canelo won didn't even score the fights. They just like Canelo and they're inclined to give the decision to anyone that managed to last the distance with GGG.
Just like all the cowards claiming robbery for the Fulton vs Figueroa fight (I scored it a draw). They all said who they "felt" won the fight but they didn't post scorecards during the fight, they didn't post scorecards before the decision was read. They just yelled afterwards.
GGG vs Jacobs: 7-5 GGG plus a knockdown
GGG vs Canelo: 8-4 GGG
GGG vs Canelo II: 7-5 GGG
GGG vs Derevyanchenko 6-6 with the knockdown edging the fight to GGG
Effective Aggresion
DEFENSE (Which u missed or completely ignored)
Ring Generalship
Hard and Clean Punches
So which 4 rounds you GIFT Canelo in the 2nd fight??? I can use a good laugh.
Comment
Comment