When knockouts are as commonplace as a trip to the loo, whats so special about them?
I suppose it just means with more options and permutations in the end a knockout isn't a big deal at all in MMA.
Like wilder losing to fury, was a rare occurrence in boxing but in MMA the top guy would lose and youd be like "oh ok, cool"
that why MMA just isn't as good for me.
It's like basketball, American football, rugby ..a goal is not a big deal as it's just end to end stuff. Then you get soccer where I can watch a 0-0 draw and still come out of it entertained because of the quality of defending. The point is a sport has to be evenly balanced between offense, defence.
Besides, I'm being told it's competitive only to get shown a video of ppl getting knocked out. Yet if that was boxing people would say "it's too one sided".
Comment