No, the argument is that it would be impossible for Fury to cheat in the manner proposed when his hand wrapping and glove-donning was watched by both an athletic comission and the opposing trainer.
Citing a case where someone got caught using an altogether more surrepticious method agrees with the contention that it would be impossible for Fury to get away with it.
We get it -- you'll believe anything Wilder says, no matter how lacking the evidence. Well done.
Citing a case where someone got caught using an altogether more surrepticious method agrees with the contention that it would be impossible for Fury to get away with it.
We get it -- you'll believe anything Wilder says, no matter how lacking the evidence. Well done.
Comment