i think tito would win a tough fight but i think he could find pwill eventually espesially at 147 tito was a machine at that weight
Tito will destroy PWILL at 147 and 154 IMO
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
PWill would annihilate Tito. He would make Tito look out of his league. Too much work rate. Tito probably wont be KO'd but he would definately be outclassed 100%.
For Tito to win, PWill would need to be robbed(in msg). Just like Foreman said "Bernard can't let this go to a decision."Comment
-
Go back and read the whole thread. I never said Tito beats Paul because of how he handles slick boxers. In fact, I've been more than adamant that Williams is NOT a slick boxer and why Tito would beat him, yet you have nothing to refute that.No no my argument is if someone says Tito beating Whitaker and Macho is an example of how he handles slick boxers why is Tito losing to Winky not a counter argument of how slick boxers handle him.
Whitaker and Macho were past prime and that's ok? but a past prime Tito losing to Winky is a bad example?Comment
-
But didn't Tito beat a prime Whitaker and Macho proving he handles slick boxers??? We're still on that answer.PWill would annihilate Tito. He would make Tito look out of his league. Too much work rate. Tito probably wont be KO'd but he would definately be outclassed 100%.
For Tito to win, PWill would need to be robbed(in msg). Just like Foreman said "Bernard can't let this go to a decision."Comment
-
Ok I see what your saying, But I wouldnt put Whitaker and Camacho in the same boat with Winky as far as boxing style's. Camacho in his prime and Whitaker in the prime were just untouchable, way to fast and slick, Winky just had very tight defense but was not really slick in my book. But the topic of this thread is Pwill -vs Tito..and at 147 or 154 Tito would be to much for him. If you take Pwill and turn the clock back I dont think he would be 1 of the top guys back then, DLH, Quartey,Tito would all be to much for him. Pwill is very good in todays class..but back in the late 90's the WW division was loaded..No no my argument is if someone says Tito beating Whitaker and Macho is an example of how he handles slick boxers why is Tito losing to Winky not a counter argument of how slick boxers handle him.
Whitaker and Macho were past prime and that's ok? but a past prime Tito losing to Winky is a bad example?Comment
-
Too lazy to read the whole thread. Just answer the question were Whitaker and Macho prime when Tito beat them?Comment
-
What the hell does a slick boxer have to do with PWill? PWill isn't exactly "slick" rating him at his best, he is basically Margarito but with speed, footwork, and a high boxing IQ.
I have no doubt in my mind that Tito would not be able to handle 1400 punches over 12 rounds. Unable to hurt his opponent(PWill's iron chin), incredibly unorthodox SOUTHPAW style and a constant pressure that made Margarito of all people get thrown off his game.Comment
-
gtfoh.Ok I see what your saying, But I wouldnt put Whitaker and Camacho in the same boat with Winky as far as boxing style's. Camacho in his prime and Whitaker in the prime were just untouchable, way to fast and slick, Winky just had very tight defense but was not really slick in my book. But the topic of this thread is Pwill -vs Tito..and at 147 or 154 Tito would be to much for him. If you take Pwill and turn the clock back I dont think he would be 1 of the top guys back then, DLH, Quartey,Tito would all be to much for him. Pwill is very good in todays class..but back in the late 90's the WW division was loaded..
Williams would be an ATG if he started back then. He would have beat DLH, Quartey and Tito. Undoubdtly. If he didn't it would be a VERY VERY VERY controversial DECISION loss.Comment
-
I'll do you a favor and credit your ignorance to not reading the whole thread, or a sever lack of reading comprehension. Unless of course you want to go and find the post where I said Tito "handles" slick boxers because he beat Whitaker? I'll be waiting.Comment
Comment