Tito will destroy PWILL at 147 and 154 IMO

[lparm]

What the hell does a slick boxer have to do with PWill? PWill isn't exactly "slick" rating him at his best, he is basically Margarito but with speed, footwork, and a high boxing IQ.

I have no doubt in my mind that Tito would not be able to handle 1400 punches over 12 rounds. Unable to hurt his opponent(PWill's iron chin), incredibly unorthodox SOUTHPAW style and a constant pressure that made Margarito of all people get thrown off his game.

I never said PW was slick, ever my problem was someone using the faded Whitaker and Macho as examples of how good Tito handles slick boxers and apparently Tito losing to Winky doesn't count when talking about how Tito loses to great boxers. I don't really care about Tito vs PW cause guess what it will never ever happen it's all guesswork nothing more just a bunch of guys passing the time giving opinions on a hypothetical fight that will never take place. I just disagree with using faded guys as proof of someones handling of a style of boxer. I mean I'm a big Cal fan but if I said he'd beat a prime RJJ easily I'd be kidding myself.

[lparm]

I'll do you a favor and credit your ignorance to not reading the whole thread, or a sever lack of reading comprehension. Unless of course you want to go and find the post where I said Tito "handles" slick boxers because he beat Whitaker? I'll be waiting.

Well it seems you're an even lazier a*hole than me

Im saying Tito beat up one of the slickest defensive fighters ever, albeit past his best. Im saying he did the same thing to Camacho.

There you go I guess that answers my question and points out where you said Tito handled slick boxers.

[onetwopunch]

gtfoh.

Williams would be an ATG if he started back then. He would have beat DLH, Quartey and Tito. Undoubdtly. If he didn't it would be a VERY VERY VERY controversial DECISION loss.

Wow...and dont forget Mosely to right..Come on back then the WW division was stacked..DLH,Mosely,Quartey and Tito..I dont see anyone currently who would have beet them..say Margarito, Williams, Cotto, PBF..if they were to have been fighting at 147 back when DLH,Mosely,Quartey and Tito were at 147..they would get there @sses handed to them.

[Equinox]

all of you that said tito beats williams, you guys are on some gooood ****. wow.

[JAB5239]

I never said PW was slick, ever my problem was someone using the faded Whitaker and Macho as examples of how good Tito handles slick boxers and apparently Tito losing to Winky doesn't count when talking about how Tito loses to great boxers. I don't really care about Tito vs PW cause guess what it will never ever happen it's all guesswork nothing more just a bunch of guys passing the time giving opinions on a hypothetical fight that will never take place. I just disagree with using faded guys as proof of someones handling of a style of boxer. I mean I'm a big Cal fan but if I said he'd beat a prime RJJ easily I'd be kidding myself.

You're kidding yourself right now and flat out trying to lie to everybody else. show the post where I said any of the bolded. On top of that you have refused to answer questions DIRECTLY related to the thread. Thats always been par for the course with you though, hasn't it?

[oc9979]

all of you that said tito beats williams, you guys are on some gooood ****. wow.

Williams is right there to be hit while Tito just have to land a clean left hook or a right cross.

[lparm]

I'll be waiting.

Jabbo I have an image in my head of what you're like infront of your computer




ROFL

NERD RAGE!!!! I'll be waiting ROFL

[lparm]

You're kidding yourself right now and flat out trying to lie to everybody else. show the post where I said any of the bolded. On top of that you have refused to answer questions DIRECTLY related to the thread. Thats always been par for the course with you though, hasn't it?

My thoughts on PW-Tito...Umm it never has or will happen it's all hypothetical and there is no right answer because unless it happens no one can know the result of 2 world class guys fighting. Oh and I posted what you said about Tito beating one of the slickest defensive guys...

[JAB5239]

Well it seems you're an even lazier a*hole than me

Im saying Tito beat up one of the slickest defensive fighters ever, albeit past his best. Im saying he did the same thing to Camacho.

There you go I guess that answers my question and points out where you said Tito handled slick boxers.

Where did I say that proves he could "handle" slick boxers? You won't find that because I never did. On top of that, why don't you copy and paste the post I was responding to? You know, the one that said Tito only beat brawlers, until I disproved that with the post I said those words in. Nice try kid, but not good enough.

[BAlvarez]

no chance in hell