Notice: Nate Campbell WAS in the fight.

[warp1432]

Campbell it seemed had his wits about him when the round ended. Yes Bradley was going for the KO and it looked wonderful but again the butt brought about the flurry at the end of the round.

No...a left hook did. It brought a flurry on right away, but Campbell did a good job of avoiding most of that besides a good right hand. A punch definitely caused him being hurt though

[warp1432]

That would all make sense, if the fight was stopped because of the cut. It wasn't. It was stopped because Nate was seeing spots, and the doctor saw blood INSIDE Nates eyeball.

How is that the cut's fault then? If blood was dripping into his eye, then Cotto-Clottey should have been stopped too because surely Cotto had blood dripping in his eye...

If it was a blood vessel was cut, wouldn't that be more likely from a punch...say a right uppercut?

[!! Shawn]

No...a left hook did. It brought a flurry on right away, but Campbell did a good job of avoiding most of that besides a good right hand. A punch definitely caused him being hurt though

Obviously he was buzzed by a punch, but he was not as hurt as it looked. He was covering up and getting battered around, but he was blocking the punches. Bradley did a good job of making it look worse than it was.

[warp1432]

I think you are right, the amateur system has created a new breed of fighter who by and large has forgotten many of the old school tricks. Infighting is really becoming a lost art in the modern amateur system. The fighters that win are the fast fighters with long reach that can get off first and run. There is no reward for working the craft, or placing body shots, which is disappointing.

Bradley throws plenty of body shots, but you are right in general.

[warp1432]

Obviously he was buzzed by a punch, but he was not as hurt as it looked. He was covering up and getting battered around, but he was blocking the punches. Bradley did a good job of making it look worse than it was.

You've never been hurt by a bradley punch before! You wouldn't know how hurt he was!!!!111

[Crazylegs77]

No...a left hook did. It brought a flurry on right away, but Campbell did a good job of avoiding most of that besides a good right hand. A punch definitely caused him being hurt though

The butt started what happened. you know what I mean. He attacked him after the butt and from that point on it was all Bradley.

[warp1432]

The butt started what happened. you know what I mean.

I know what you mean, but you're wrong

All it takes is one good punch to start that and it did. The headbutt had him realing (sp), but it still could have happened with one good punch

[!! Shawn]

How is that the cut's fault then? If blood was dripping into his eye, then Cotto-Clottey should have been stopped too because surely Cotto had blood dripping in his eye...

If it was a blood vessel was cut, wouldn't that be more likely from a punch...say a right uppercut?

Thats not blood dripping into the eye. That is blood INSIDE THE EYEBALL. Blood from a possibly torn retina.



Blood inside the eye, not running into the eye.

[Crazylegs77]

I know what you mean, but you're wrong

So after the butt, Nate didnt complain and meanwhile Bradley didnt jump on him and from that point on go for the KO. I dont get what your arguing.

[!! Shawn]

You've never been hurt by a bradley punch before! You wouldn't know how hurt he was!!!!111

You make points that look good on the outside, but when you look at the facts, they fall apart. Nate went back to the corner clear as a bell. Thats not how a fighter that was badly hurt goes back to the corner. Just ask Antonio Margarito.