Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Roach: "Pacquiao Doesn't Need Cotto Without The Belt"

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by znarfv_y2k8 View Post
    Here u are again, the same sentences & words used...Limited ideas means limited understanding of the whole truth...nonsense...
    its funny how when i say ******* there you appear out of the shadows.

    Comment


    • *** this fight, let's get Pac and Mayweather instead

      Comment


      • They both have some common sense in what they say!

        Comment


        • Originally posted by raidersal1124 View Post
          Good for Cotto! Pac wants to be welterweight champ, then come up to 147 limit like all ther real welterweights champs do it! if you can fight DLH at 147 why cant you fight Cotto at 147?
          manny-oscar is at 145 lbs.....not 147
          a lot of people doesn't know this simple fact!!

          Comment


          • Pacquiao can't have in both ways, but in many ways....

            Originally posted by arcruz View Post
            Pacquiao can not have it both ways. He can either have the weight or the title, but not both. If the fight if for the welterweight title (limit of 147), it means than Cotto can weight up to 147, but Pacquiao wants to create a new "welterweight" division with a limit of 145. He and Roach can go f**k themselves.
            Pacquiao can't have in both ways, but in many ways because he is the man..

            Everybody knows Pacquiao's the man in boxing, he's the draw, opponents were lined up before him to choose from...Pacquiao's the smaller fighter, he sets condition to fight a bigger champion at a bigger weight, a catch weight at 145lb & w/ the belt on the line is reasonable for motivation & history, it's plain & simple take it or leave it...

            So, Roach is right that "Pacquiao doesn't need Cotto w/out the belt, he has many options to consider that's reality"...

            Comment


            • Eversince ur nonsense...

              Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
              its funny how when i say ******* there you appear out of the shadows.
              It's not about terms, it's about what ur writing nonsense...

              Comment


              • "roach just said cotto is shot were going to expose him" the only one exposed is team pac and their tailor made handpicking ways in their opponent selection. they only want to face guys with percieved weaknesses and not guys at the top like jmm, mosley or gayweather.I truly hope cotto pulls the upset , shut roach and pac the fawk up.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
                  its funny how when i say ******* there you appear out of the shadows.
                  ...it's also because i'm tired of reading annoying & nonsense things around here...

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by znarfv_y2k8 View Post
                    It's not about terms, it's about what ur writing nonsense...
                    non sense is your train of thought , would pac go and fight margarito? hhmmmm? what about mosley ??? pfff not even at 140 would your ***** midget champ face mosley what about clottey would pac ever even consider him? FAWK NOOOOOOOOOOO THAT LITTLE MIDGET WOULDNT!!!!!!!!! PFFFFFFFFFF

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by boxingfan76 View Post
                      "roach just said cotto is shot were going to expose him" the only one exposed is team pac and their tailor made handpicking ways in their opponent selection. they only want to face guys with percieved weaknesses and not guys at the top like jmm, mosley or gayweather.I truly hope cotto pulls the upset , shut roach and pac the fawk up.
                      Another nonsense when did Roach said that, actually he respect Cotto but only believes that Pac's fast pace will neutralize his ability after the later rounds...Cotto is very strong & great champion, no question about it...

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP