Roach: "Pacquiao Doesn't Need Cotto Without The Belt"
Collapse
-
-
Depends how famous you are. Leonard won a title without ever fighting in between the limited weights for that title so I can't see why it couldn't be done as above also. You just need to be really famous.Comment
-
Your simply an Idiot & ******ed, your not in this place...Go out of here, ur not a Pac fan, or Cotto fan either...Go where ur hero resides, cause u can't find any place to talk about ur hero...No one is interested too, ur a nomadic fan...Comment
-
because he wanted a easy fight with Cotto to test the water lol...Cotto=Pollo TropicalIF PACYA SO SECURE AND CONFIDENT WHY DID HE SHAMLESSLEY AND VERY PUBLICLY DUCK MOSLEY HMMmmm????????even at 140!!!!! or even jmm on his own turf??? manny he dont want none .only guys he can easily beat so you shouldnt boast about feeling secure.pacya isnt billy badass, a lot of what he is has to do with the media.Comment
-
Co-sign. The path to greatness does not allow for shortcuts. Either way, Pac's gets his a** handed to him, 147 or 145, belt or no belt.
And by the way, this thread is insane. PBF, cant wait for your weak ass PPV numbers.Comment
-
legitimacy and legacy
i agree that if we want legacy from manny he should fyt at legit ww limit.
alibis and criticisms, even doubts, will not stop if he wins the belt at 145.
all praises and props will come manny's way whether he wins or loses against a legit welter in cotto.
this will be a bigger risk for manny...but legitimacy of title equates better with legacy.
Comment
-
There are two reasons why he'll make more against Cotto: (a) Cotto is a bigger draw than Mosley, and (b) Cotto-Pac is an all Top Rank fight so there is only one promoter's fee.
And Cotto is reportedly getting around 35% anyway.Comment
Comment