Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

reason why hopkins fights smaller fighters

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
    Tell that to Eric Morales. At least Hopkins can still win.

    Morales isn't fighting guys 2 weight divisions below him either.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
      Pavlik brings more money. And it was Pavlik who pursued Hopkins, not the other way around. Also, it's funny how the so called weight difference was only brought up after Pavlik got served. All that was talked about on here was how Pavlik was going to kick Hopkins ass. Don't use the weight excuse now. Pavlik is a huge middlweight who can easily fight at 175.
      I brought it up before the fight, and even with other fighters way before that, so it wasn't anything new to me. You act as if I'm a Pavlik fan, never was one and never will. Yes, he can fight at 175 fighting mediocre fighters.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by chicano79us View Post
        I brought it up before the fight, and even with other fighters way before that, so it wasn't anything new to me. You act as if I'm a Pavlik fan, never was one and never will. Yes, he can fight at 175 fighting mediocre fighters.
        So Tarver and Calzaghe are mediocre huh? Please. That's laughable.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by chicano79us View Post
          Morales isn't fighting guys 2 weight divisions below him either.
          So by your logic Morales is a chicken **** for fighting Pacquiao who came up from flyweight. Please.

          Comment


          • #25
            Pavlik is a much bigger draw then Dawson. B-Hop has stated that the only thing that'll motivate him to fight...is a Calzaghe rematch. I still think B-Hop vs Dawson is still possible...I'm hoping for it

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
              So Tarver and Calzaghe are mediocre huh? Please.

              Tarver isn't that great to begin with. All his hype is the Jones win & the Rocky movie. Calzaghe beat Hopkins, he STILL had to come up to face him lol. How many Great Fighters has Hopkins beat HIS SIZE??

              Comment


              • #27
                I think also when you compare roy vs bernard...

                Roy ALWAYS fighting bigger fighters and bernard ALWAYS fighting smaller fighters should be taken into account...

                I take nothing away from Bernard, hes still doin what hes doin at 43, but still....all his big wins have come against fighters moving up to face him, except for tarver... and in that win, tarver had to lose 40 pounds from the rocky movie.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Dude beat everybody put in front of him. He didn't go outta his way to pick on smaller guys, they called on him and he fought em.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
                    So by your logic Morales is a chicken **** for fighting Pacquiao who came up from flyweight. Please.
                    Pac was at 125 before he faced Morales at 130, not 112. Try again.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by mangler View Post
                      Dude beat everybody put in front of him. He didn't go outta his way to pick on smaller guys, they called on him and he fought em.
                      Dude as much as I respect you and think you're one of the best posters on here. I don't recall them calling him out, I do recall however, him calling them out.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP