reason why hopkins fights smaller fighters
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Theres always the next guy. Before Hopkins beat Pavlik if you asked the board who was better between pavlik and Dawson they would say Pavlik.
Dawson brings no money to the table if he did Nard would happily school him.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I picked Pacquiao to win (and won millions of e-points). I thought it was a great fight since boxing doesn't have too many mega fights these days and that was one of the few that could have been made. Size obviously doesn't matter too much in boxing.
And the arguement about hopkins beating smaller fighters is kind of void anyways since hopkins doesnt use his height or size advantage when he fights. He's too defensive and crouches his head down and is a counter puncher.Comment
-
So I take it you were one of the very few who criticized DLH for fighting a "smaller" Pac for $$$$ then.I picked Pacquiao to win (and won millions of e-points). I thought it was a great fight since boxing doesn't have too many mega fights these days and that was one of the few that could have been made. Size obviously doesn't matter too much in boxing.
And the arguement about hopkins beating smaller fighters is kind of void anyways since hopkins doesnt use his height or size advantage when he fights. He's too defensive and crouches his head down and is a counter puncher.
Not a void at all bro, he wasn't able to bully Cal like he did to Pavlik. Weight helps alot in boxing.Comment
Comment