reason why hopkins fights smaller fighters
Collapse
-
-
I brought it up before the fight, and even with other fighters way before that, so it wasn't anything new to me. You act as if I'm a Pavlik fan, never was one and never will. Yes, he can fight at 175 fighting mediocre fighters.Pavlik brings more money. And it was Pavlik who pursued Hopkins, not the other way around. Also, it's funny how the so called weight difference was only brought up after Pavlik got served. All that was talked about on here was how Pavlik was going to kick Hopkins ass. Don't use the weight excuse now. Pavlik is a huge middlweight who can easily fight at 175.Comment
-
So Tarver and Calzaghe are mediocre huh? Please. That's laughable.Comment
-
Comment
-
Pavlik is a much bigger draw then Dawson. B-Hop has stated that the only thing that'll motivate him to fight...is a Calzaghe rematch. I still think B-Hop vs Dawson is still possible...I'm hoping for itComment
-
Comment
-
I think also when you compare roy vs bernard...
Roy ALWAYS fighting bigger fighters and bernard ALWAYS fighting smaller fighters should be taken into account...
I take nothing away from Bernard, hes still doin what hes doin at 43, but still....all his big wins have come against fighters moving up to face him, except for tarver... and in that win, tarver had to lose 40 pounds from the rocky movie.Comment
-
Comment
-
Dude as much as I respect you and think you're one of the best posters on here. I don't recall them calling him out, I do recall however, him calling them out.Comment
Comment