Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

just came to the conclusion hopkins was clearly robbed

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by link2296 View Post
    At the end of one of the rounds, not sure which one...haven't seen the fight in a while, Clazaghe lands a perfect left hand and possibly hurts Hopkins...Hopkins can't find his corner after that shot!! I think HBO shows that left hand shot by Calzaghe during the countdown for Pavlik Hopkins fight while Freddie Roach is talking.

    To this day, i believe that both men underestimated each other...this is why a rematch is a necessity!!
    hopkins was never hurt. calzaghe can't hurt anyone and that shot you are talking about barely landed. it landed mostly on hopkins glove and grazed his head if you really pay attention but you thought calzaghe won so i wouldnt expect you to pay too much attention to landed punches.

    Comment


    • fights that could have gone either way cannot be robberies.

      Comment


      • the ony people who think hopkins won are either ******ed or from philadelphia.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by brooklyn kid View Post
          it clearly shows joe cortez spinning hopkins around as the bell rings

          **** this was even said during the countdown to pavlik-hopkins

          NICE JOB SMOKEY!!!!
          Sorry, man...your boy lost due to lack of huevos...it is obvious to anyone who saw that fight, those who aren't on B-hops nuts, that Joe Cazaghe figured out the enigma of Bhop after round four...B-hop didn't do anything to win that fight after round 4...if you think Calzaghe didn't do enough to win, guess what, your boy did less!!

          Comment


          • If Hopkins did more work, he would have won the fight, landing 1 significant punch in 3 rounds doesn't win him the fight for me compared to Calzaghe working 3 minutes of most rounds.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by larryx View Post
              only calzaghe fans cant see joe didnt land ****,but hopkins blew that fight towards the end due to lack of activity(not saying joe landed ****) but bernard made it easy for the judges to vote for joe..
              wow excent post man.


              I didnt think Joe landed anything significan but he did land way more punches than Hopkins.

              Hopkins may have countered some punches but he was landing 5 to 10 punches a round, plus Joe was landing between 20-25 punches even tho they may have been soft.

              Hopkins gave that fight away and i guarantee u if they fought again the same outcome would happen.

              Hopkins wont change his style, He saw how he started real slow vs. Taylor and when he put the pressure he had him easly.

              The rematch came and he did the same thing and was actually beaten that time

              Comment


              • Originally posted by daggum View Post
                hopkins was never hurt. calzaghe can't hurt anyone and that shot you are talking about barely landed. it landed mostly on hopkins glove and grazed his head if you really pay attention but you thought calzaghe won so i wouldnt expect you to pay too much attention to landed punches.
                Calzaghe wasn't hurt either...that fight was a snoozer...it was an inactive chess match. B-hop landed some flush shots in the early rounds of the fight but did absolutely nothing to convince the judges in the middle and later rounds that he was the victor. Of course I pay attention to punches landed, but B-hop did nothing more than run and clinch the last half of the fight. It's obvious after the Pavlik fight that a little credit needs to be given to Joe Calzaghe for figuring out how to dominate b-hop!!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by link2296 View Post
                  Calzaghe wasn't hurt either...that fight was a snoozer...it was an inactive chess match. B-hop landed some flush shots in the early rounds of the fight but did absolutely nothing to convince the judges in the middle and later rounds that he was the victor. Of course I pay attention to punches landed, but B-hop did nothing more than run and clinch the last half of the fight. It's obvious after the Pavlik fight that a little credit needs to be given to Joe Calzaghe for figuring out how to dominate b-hop!!
                  wrong he got knocked down and almost got knocked down 2 more times. b-hop won 5 out of the first 6 rounds and at least a couple more. calzaghe did good in the second half of the fight wheeeeeeee who cares he still lost more rounds. your bad memory just thinks he won cause he did good in the final rounds.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by daggum View Post
                    wrong he got knocked down and almost got knocked down 2 more times. b-hop won 5 out of the first 6 rounds and at least a couple more. calzaghe did good in the second half of the fight wheeeeeeee who cares he still lost more rounds. your bad memory just thinks he won cause he did good in the final rounds.
                    Were we watching the same fight? Well, at least the female judge agreed with you!!

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by adamk1304 View Post
                      the ony people who think hopkins won are either ******ed or from philadelphia.
                      the only clowns that think slappy won are slappy nuthuggers or from england/uk/wales

                      I'm not even a huge Hopkins fan and I don't see how flailing you're arms like a goof will warrant a win, especially when Hopkins held the belt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP