Joe Calzaghe vs Kelly Pavlik

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • them_apples
    Lord
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 9996
    • 1,238
    • 936
    • 41,722

    #31
    Originally posted by MacChamp
    People were taling **** on here saying that Pavlik would kick Kesslers ass in a fight. After what I saw tonight, it looks like a pure boxer would beat the crap out of Pavlik... Whats Kessler??? A good boxer...
    Kessler and Hopkins have nothing in common, Kessler doesn't move and slip like Hopkins, Hopkins is the sneakiest boxer out there, he would box Kesslers ears off.

    I love how Hopkins beats Pavlik and everyone thinks Pavlik will lose to anyone now. Lets not forget Pavlik beat Jermain Taylor and Edison Miranda.

    Joe didn't really beat Hopkins, he swarmed him and looked busy, in the replays he isn't landing anything good.

    I hardly think Pavlik would get wooped by Kessler, Kessler would not avoid everything.

    Comment

    • Dirk Diggler UK
      Deleted
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Jun 2008
      • 48836
      • 1,312
      • 693
      • 58,902

      #32
      Originally posted by them_apples
      Kessler and Hopkins have nothing in common, Kessler doesn't move and slip like Hopkins, Hopkins is the sneakiest boxer out there, he would box Kesslers ears off.

      I love how Hopkins beats Pavlik and everyone thinks Pavlik will lose to anyone now. Lets not forget Pavlik beat Jermain Taylor and Edison Miranda.

      Joe didn't really beat Hopkins, he swarmed him and looked busy, in the replays he isn't landing anything good.

      I hardly think Pavlik would get wooped by Kessler, Kessler would not avoid everything.
      Still think Pavlik would "destroy" Calzaghe?

      Comment

      • Dan...
        Fredette About It
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Jun 2008
        • 7675
        • 454
        • 951
        • 19,200

        #33
        I always thought Calzaghe would beat Pavlik and I think no differently now. Pavlik is a very good boxer but he is not on the level of Calzaghe or Hopkins. Tonight showed that.

        Comment

        • them_apples
          Lord
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Aug 2007
          • 9996
          • 1,238
          • 936
          • 41,722

          #34
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
          Still think Pavlik would "destroy" Calzaghe?
          Pavlik lost because Hopkins has some of the best footwork in the game. Calzaghe doesn't. Calzaghe throws a lot of punches and he brawls some of the time, he's not as elusive as Hopkins ether.

          Pavlik lost but he has still destroyed his share of decent fighters. It would be no Jeff Lacy BS.

          One thing is for sure, Joe didn't really beat Hopkins ether, whichever way you spin it.

          I will give Calzaghe more Credit than I have in the past though.

          Comment

          • Clegg
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Mar 2008
            • 24673
            • 3,726
            • 2,307
            • 233,274

            #35
            Them_apples, you are ******. Please die.

            Comment

            • Dirk Diggler UK
              Deleted
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 48836
              • 1,312
              • 693
              • 58,902

              #36
              Originally posted by them_apples
              Pavlik lost because Hopkins has some of the best footwork in the game. Calzaghe doesn't. Calzaghe throws a lot of punches and he brawls some of the time, he's not as elusive as Hopkins ether.

              Pavlik lost but he has still destroyed his share of decent fighters. It would be no Jeff Lacy BS.

              One thing is for sure, Joe didn't really beat Hopkins ether, whichever way you spin it.

              I will give Calzaghe more Credit than I have in the past though.
              So.......do you still think he'd beat Calzaghe or not?

              Hes beat Jermain Taylor. Calzaghe would beat him in similar fashion to Lacy. Ive said it all along.

              Joe beat Hopkins. Whichever way you spin it. He won the fight.

              Good for you.

              Comment

              • Dan...
                Fredette About It
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Jun 2008
                • 7675
                • 454
                • 951
                • 19,200

                #37
                Originally posted by Clegg
                Them_apples, you are ******. Please die.
                That would be ideal wouldn't it?

                I have forgotten how many arguments I have had with this guy where his position was so ridiculous it was incredible.

                Comment

                • them_apples
                  Lord
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 9996
                  • 1,238
                  • 936
                  • 41,722

                  #38
                  Originally posted by Clegg
                  Them_apples, you are ******. Please die.
                  shut the **** up

                  @ dance, I really thought we had some decent tolerable arguments, some of which we agree on, some of them you even changed my opinion..I'm surprised you think of me that way..Forums are for Arguing aren't they?

                  Comment

                  • them_apples
                    Lord
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 9996
                    • 1,238
                    • 936
                    • 41,722

                    #39
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK
                    So.......do you still think he'd beat Calzaghe or not?

                    Hes beat Jermain Taylor. Calzaghe would beat him in similar fashion to Lacy. Ive said it all along.

                    Joe beat Hopkins. Whichever way you spin it. He won the fight.

                    Good for you.
                    show me some Footage of Calzaghe landing something meaningful on Hopkins and maybe I'll change my opinion.

                    Comment

                    • Dan...
                      Fredette About It
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 7675
                      • 454
                      • 951
                      • 19,200

                      #40
                      Originally posted by them_apples
                      shut the **** up

                      @ dance, I really thought we had some decent tolerable arguments, some of which we agree on, some of them you even changed my opinion..I'm surprised you think of me that way..Forums are for Arguing aren't they?
                      I just get the ****s with the way guys like you turn the discussion on these boards from topics on logical boxing to just Calzaghe haters and Calzaghe huggers throwing **** at each other. people like you and daggum just hate the ****n euros and thats fine but it just gets annoying when every thread turns into the same ****.

                      Also you said Pernell was overrated. That don't sit well with me son. Noone ****s on Pea.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP