Was Leonard as ragged on as Mayweather is?

[Njord777]

Razor thin...
HHAHAHA

I would think that would be no people nuthugging fighters from 20 years ago, but you are pathetic...

1) Leonard-Duran was not a “razor thin” decision, look at Leonard's expression after that fight to know that there was nothing in common with Hagler-Leonard in terms of how close it was. NOTHING.

2) He didnt need to moan because he immediately got his rematch, after a fight where the winner was clear to the entire boxing world. On the other hand he retired to avoiding a rematch with Hagler, in a fight on which people still discuss. EDIT: No **** Hagler complained. To make Leonard's behavior even more obvious he made his comeback when Hagler retired.

Not only Mayweather got a W against Castillo in the 1st place, but after a close fight there was a rematch to dissipate all controversy. OH, if only Leonard EVER was involved in rematches of his own close fights, then what you type would not smell like bull**** from a mile.

I think you're on point, sir.

[wmute]

maybe they should have used Leonards expression to score the fight instead of using the scorecards then LOL ,idiot

Moron, the fight was a UD and no one, nobody ever doubted that the outcome matched the fight. I am mentioning Leonard's expression to tell you that even Leonard knew who won the fight.

Leonard v Duran was closer than Hagler v Leonard thats the point im making

and its a completley wrong point. it is bull****, plain and simple why don't you start a poll?

You are to Leonard what Horus is to Mayweather. Maybe even worse. You are a nuthugger who couldnt see a fact if god appeared in front of him to tell him “Hey moron that's it”.

but Hagler knew before hand he would not be getting a rematch he got pwned and acted like the biggest baby in the history of the sport ,Leonard said he only wanted to beat Hagler and he did it end of story

You can go around it as much as you want, but the story is simple and it's hard to back up Leonard on this one.

Hagler: ”rematch!“
Leonard: “sorry cant i am retired”
Hagler: ”OK, I will retire“
Leonard: ”OK, I will come back“

but no... you still back up your boy... Why dont you just make our life easier and jump on some present fighter bandwagon (cotto, mayweather, pacman there is plenty out there, you won't be alone there)

im not suprised Floyd rematched Castillo it was the least he could do after blantently robbing the fella ,Castillo was nothing but a B Class fighter and he still Pwned PBF shows u how overated that chump really was no wonder he wants no part of Cotto if Castillo can own his ass

no robbing... especially if you considered Hagler-Leonard not as close as Duran-Leonard for Leonard, you probably SHOULD score Castillo-Mayweather for Mayweather.

Although Hagler is my favorite fighter (and way better than Castillo, pound for pound and prime for prime), he was sluggish enough by 1986 that a prime Castillo was proably a tougher challenge p4p. (especially with those 10 pounds separating Castillo and Mayweather on fight night)

[Dynamite Kid]

Floyd > 34 year old Oscar Dela Hoya

SRL > Duran ,Hagler ,Hearns,Benitez


J L Castillo

[Njord777]

Wait a minute....did someone say Leonard 'pwned' Hagler? What fight are we talking about? I've watched that fight several times....and if you say Hagler was 'pwned' you're either an idiot or you've never seen the fight.

[wmute]

Floyd > 34 year old Oscar Dela Hoya

SRL > Duran ,Hagler ,Hearns,Benitez


J L Castillo

So you are legt without arguments and you are trying to resort to bad logic.

I hate to break it to you, but...

x > y

z > q

y > q

does not imply that x > q.

Also, Leonard was so convinced of being ”better“ than the mentioned that he always avoided getting in the ring with them after their confrontations.

[Grappler_Baki60]

None of you have any idea if Mayweather is coming back to fight the Cotto-De La Hoya winner. My money says he will. The only one who can screw this up is Cotto by losing to Margarito. Cotto needs to prove himself and earn a mega money fight. If he wins this one, he deserves it. If he beats Oscar, he'll get it.

Yeah man I feel the same way. Too bad other are ****** and don't see it the way we do.

[Dynamite Kid]

So you are legt without arguments and you are trying to resort to bad logic.

I hate to break it to you, but...

x > y

z > q

y > q

does not imply that x > q.

Also, Leonard was so convinced of being ”better“ than the mentioned that he always avoided getting in the ring with them after their confrontations.

Floyd would 'nt have the balls to get in the ring with them one time he is to afraid he is gonna lose his 0

after all a B Class fighter whooped him

[wmute]

Wait a minute....did someone say Leonard 'pwned' Hagler? What fight are we talking about? I've watched that fight several times....and if you say Hagler was 'pwned' you're either an idiot or you've never seen the fight.

Njord, my man, this idiot just claimed Leonard-Duran was closer than Hagler-Leonard... what else could you expect?

[wmute]

Floyd would 'nt have the balls to get in the ring with them one time he is to afraid he is gonna lose his 0

after all a B Class fighter whooped him

woulda coulda.

1) you fail to reply to my posts and keep on changing topic. I reply to everytihng you say, always on point, you cannot do that, why?

2) you are starting to fantasize and use wrong logic to back up your claims. why?

1+2= why dont you do the math and just drop it,

dont reply...
say that you have something to do...
isnt it better than keeping on looking like an idiot?

I will summarize the situation here for you you are makig many claims, some of which are completely ridiculous, and all of them denote bias pro the fighter in your avatar and signature...

I also have something better to do than wasting brain activity to rebutt on your inane posts. so why dont you go to bed, it's late in UK... you should be in a club or sleeping... not in front of a computer (unless you are doing a nightshift at work, in which case with all the time you have at hand.

[Dynamite Kid]

woulda coulda.

1) you fail to reply to my posts and keep on changing topic. I reply to everytihng you say, always on point, you cannot do that, why?

2) you are starting to fantasize and use wrong logic to back up your claims. why?

1+2= why dont you do the math and just drop it,

dont reply...
say that you have something to do...
isnt it better than keeping on looking like an idiot?

I will summarize the situation here for you you are makig many claims, some of which are completely ridiculous, and all of them denote bias pro the fighter in your avatar and signature...

I also have something better to do than wasting brain activity to rebutt on your inane posts. so why dont you go to bed, it's late in UK... you should be in a club or sleeping... not in front of a computer (unless you are doing a nightshift at work, in which case with all the time you have at hand.

cant be bothered to read drawn out posts TBH, just know your boy has beat nobody compared to SRL oposition and he got his ass handed to him by a B Class fighter

bye