Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Calzaghe a Top 25 Fighter in the last 30 Years?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #71
    Originally posted by pesticid View Post
    We just had a poll about Tito and TArver and a lot of people think that Tito was a bigger victory for Bhop. So now Tito is too small for Winky but he was just about the right size for Hopkins?

    What is wrong with you!
    i seriously used to think you were a credible poster

    ofcourse tarver is the better win for hopkins, who would be the better win for klitschko, haye or miguel cotto? Tito was a natural welterweight who lost when he moved several weight classes above his natural weight, he was undefeated at WW and beat big names there. something calzaghe has NEVER done in his whole career...not a beat a single great fighter in his prime, NEVER...he has that 0 because he has been cherry picking carefully.

    Comment


    • #72
      Pernell Whitaker
      Oscar De La Hoya
      Felix Trinidad got his ass handing to him by Hopkins
      Roy Jones Jr
      Bernard Hopkins was beaten by Calzaghe after coming of a career best win
      Floyd Mayweather
      Lennox Lewis
      Evander Holyfield
      Mike Tyson sorry Mike was great in his prime, but any fighter that loses vs McBride can't be considered better than Calzaghe
      Larry Holmes
      George Foreman
      Manny Pacquiao
      Erik Morales
      Marco Antonio Barrera
      Julio Cesar Chavez
      James Toney lost to ****ty Griffen twice......
      Juan Manuel Marquez
      Wilfredo Gomez
      Alexis Arguello
      Miguel Cotto Bit early to be saying Cotto is better? he was almost KO'd by Torres
      Aaron Pryor
      Roberto Duran
      Kostya Tsyzu Lost to a average Phillips
      Thomas Hearns
      Sugar Ray Leonard
      Winky Wright Lost to Hopkins recently....
      Shane Mosley Loses to Forrest...
      Michael Spinks
      Jose Luis Castillo Far to many loses....

      Comment


      • #73
        Originally posted by aussieboxer2320 View Post
        calzaghe is NOT better than any of those fighters.... i can't believe the extent to which some people will nut hug........unbelieveable
        it is pathetic...i swear to god i cant believe how extreme can these calzaghe nutlickers go, next thing you know they will argue on why Calzaghe is better than Ray Robinson and try to convince people....

        Fact is calzaghe can never say he has beaten a great fighter in his prime....all those other guys can

        Comment


        • #74
          Originally posted by Xplosivo View Post
          i seriously used to think you were a credible poster

          ofcourse tarver is the better win for hopkins, who would be the better win for klitschko, haye or miguel cotto? Tito was a natural welterweight who lost when he moved several weight classes above his natural weight, he was undefeated at WW and beat big names there. something calzaghe has NEVER done in his whole career...not a beat a single great fighter in his prime, NEVER...he has that 0 because he has been cherry picking carefully.
          Did I vote Tito?

          I voted Tarver. That's besides the point though. Check your poll! What does it show? A split opinion.

          Comment


          • #75
            Originally posted by Xplosivo View Post
            it is pathetic...i swear to god i cant believe how extreme can these calzaghe nutlickers go, next thing you know they will argue on why Calzaghe is better than Ray Robinson and try to convince people....

            Fact is calzaghe can never say he has beaten a great fighter in his prime....all those other guys can
            oh dont be so over dramatic, what are you a ****ing drama queen?

            Comment


            • #76
              Originally posted by majestiC View Post
              Pernell Whitaker
              Oscar De La Hoya
              Felix Trinidad got his ass handing to him by Hopkins
              Roy Jones Jr
              Bernard Hopkins was beaten by Calzaghe after coming of a career best win
              Floyd Mayweather
              Lennox Lewis
              Evander Holyfield
              Mike Tyson sorry Mike was great in his prime, but any fighter that loses vs McBride can't be considered better than Calzaghe
              Larry Holmes
              George Foreman
              Manny Pacquiao
              Erik Morales
              Marco Antonio Barrera
              Julio Cesar Chavez
              James Toney lost to ****ty Griffen twice......
              Juan Manuel Marquez
              Wilfredo Gomez
              Alexis Arguello
              Miguel Cotto Bit early to be saying Cotto is better? he was almost KO'd by Torres
              Aaron Pryor
              Roberto Duran
              Kostya Tsyzu Lost to a average Phillips
              Thomas Hearns
              Sugar Ray Leonard
              Winky Wright Lost to Hopkins recently....
              Shane Mosley Loses to Forrest...
              Michael Spinks
              Jose Luis Castillo Far to many loses....

              this has to be a classic post of how some boxing fans are either really ****** or just plain ignorant. maybe your new to the sport and in need of some guidance...trinidad losing to hopkins does not matter because trinidad is a natural welterweight while hopkins is a natural light heavyweight, and hopkins is considered one of the best fighters. its funny how u hypocrites downplay hopkins win against trinidad yet say trinidad isnt great because he lost to hopkins...some brits are the worst posters here honestly why cant u nationalistic ****s get this out of ur brain for once...Next thing you will say Calzaghe is better than Ali too since he lost too Trevor Berbick right? calzaghe barely edged past that ancient hopkins who a welterweight trinidad faced 7 years earlier.

              Comment


              • #77
                You know what's also funny, Shane Mosley is a proven juicer.

                Comment


                • #78
                  Originally posted by pesticid View Post
                  I guess Floyd's resume is a little stronger than Zaghe's but not by much. How come Floyd is the greatest but Zaghe can't even be the 25th in the last 30 years.



                  not by much???? floyd has beat corrales, castillo, de la hoya, hatton , baldomir, judah....................who has calzaghe beat???

                  a washed up eubank?

                  kessler??? in his prime yes, but definitely not an all time great

                  a 43 year old hopkins??? (by the skin of his teeth)


                  ****** thing to say mate

                  Comment


                  • #79
                    Originally posted by Xplosivo View Post
                    this has to be a classic post of how some boxing fans are either really ****** or just plain ignorant. maybe your new to the sport and in need of some guidance...trinidad losing to hopkins does not matter because trinidad is a natural welterweight while hopkins is a natural light heavyweight, and hopkins is considered one of the best fighters. its funny how u hypocrites downplay hopkins win against trinidad yet say trinidad isnt great because he lost to hopkins...some brits are the worst posters here honestly why cant u nationalistic ****s get this out of ur brain for once...Next thing you will say Calzaghe is better than Ali too since he lost too Trevor Berbick right? calzaghe barely edged past that ancient hopkins who a welterweight trinidad faced 7 years earlier.
                    oh please, Hopkins isn't a natural light-heavy he was middleweight champion for years fighting smaller guys. Trinidad went up in weight twice, jesus his last fight was at light heavy...., he also got whooped by Winky. Trinidad was hardly a small welter was he?

                    Comment


                    • #80
                      Originally posted by aussieboxer2320 View Post


                      not by much???? floyd has beat corrales, castillo, de la hoya, hatton , baldomir, judah....................who has calzaghe beat???

                      a washed up eubank?

                      kessler??? in his prime yes, but definitely not an all time great

                      a 43 year old hopkins??? (by the skin of his teeth)


                      ****** thing to say mate
                      you'd be in the stone age if it wasn't for calzaghe's ancestors, so shut your mouth you Aussie!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP