i seriously used to think you were a credible poster 
ofcourse tarver is the better win for hopkins, who would be the better win for klitschko, haye or miguel cotto?
Tito was a natural welterweight who lost when he moved several weight classes above his natural weight, he was undefeated at WW and beat big names there. something calzaghe has NEVER done in his whole career...not a beat a single great fighter in his prime, NEVER...he has that 0 because he has been cherry picking carefully.

ofcourse tarver is the better win for hopkins, who would be the better win for klitschko, haye or miguel cotto?
Tito was a natural welterweight who lost when he moved several weight classes above his natural weight, he was undefeated at WW and beat big names there. something calzaghe has NEVER done in his whole career...not a beat a single great fighter in his prime, NEVER...he has that 0 because he has been cherry picking carefully.
Comment