Age is nothing : Hopkins is at his prime now

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Killa Cam
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 942
    • 36
    • 68
    • 7,201

    #41
    Originally posted by tyson
    Go watch his older fights.

    Watch the one against Trinidad since that's a fighter you probably know of.
    It is hard to watch fights when you don't know the opponent.



    This is the last round of that fight.

    Tell me, does this look like the Hopkins you saw last night?

    close thread.

    Comment

    • tyson
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Oct 2003
      • 5344
      • 317
      • 435
      • 13,084

      #42
      Originally posted by Mozza
      Hopkins has never had a great work rate.
      The 10th round against Tito. Great round, high workrate.
      This is not the Hopkins you saw last night.


      Bernard Hopkins Vs Felix Trinidad - Round 10 - These bloopers are hilarious

      Comment

      • Mozza
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Sep 2006
        • 3802
        • 233
        • 174
        • 12,277

        #43
        Originally posted by tyson
        The 10th round against Tito. Great round, high workrate.
        This is not the Hopkins you saw last night.


        Bernard Hopkins Vs Felix Trinidad - Round 10 - These bloopers are hilarious
        Isolated rounds, or even isolated fights, are not proof that Hopkins ever had a high work rate and Hopkins himself admits that he has never had an especially high work rate.

        Comment

        • Killa Cam
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jan 2008
          • 942
          • 36
          • 68
          • 7,201

          #44
          Originally posted by Mozza
          Isolated rounds, or even isolated fights, are not proof that Hopkins ever had a high work rate and Hopkins himself admits that he has never had an especially high work rate.
          but does hopkins in that vid look like tha hopkins in tha 12th last night?

          Comment

          • Mozza
            Undisputed Champion
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Sep 2006
            • 3802
            • 233
            • 174
            • 12,277

            #45
            Originally posted by Killa Cam
            but does hopkins in that vid look like tha hopkins in tha 12th last night?
            That's a ****** question.

            Comment

            • tyson
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Oct 2003
              • 5344
              • 317
              • 435
              • 13,084

              #46
              Originally posted by Mozza
              That's a ****** question.
              Keep swimming, fish.

              Comment

              • Killa Cam
                Interim Champion
                Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                • Jan 2008
                • 942
                • 36
                • 68
                • 7,201

                #47
                Originally posted by Mozza
                That's a ****** question.
                wrong. simple yes or no question, and tha answer is no.

                Comment

                • Clegg
                  Banned
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 24673
                  • 3,726
                  • 2,307
                  • 233,274

                  #48
                  Originally posted by Ultimateboxa
                  Any boxing coach will tell you he was close to his best last night.
                  I asked my boxing coach. He said you are wrong.

                  Originally posted by WithAuthority
                  It's also 2008 where 43 is the new 33, especially in Hopkins case with the shape he stays in
                  Yes, Holyfield's peak is yet to come...

                  Comment

                  • RodBarker
                    Banned
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 3857
                    • 177
                    • 0
                    • 4,097

                    #49
                    Originally posted by Mozza
                    Isolated rounds, or even isolated fights, are not proof that Hopkins ever had a high work rate and Hopkins himself admits that he has never had an especially high work rate.
                    The point is not high work rate as Benny never had a high rate but he definitely had a much higher rate than he has now ,,,, and lets face facts here if he had a higher rate in this fight he wins .

                    Comment

                    • Steak
                      Undisputed Champion
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Aug 2006
                      • 10713
                      • 509
                      • 268
                      • 17,902

                      #50
                      No fighter is ever in their prime at age 43. Really, it seems amazing that this is being debated.

                      Im not incredibly impressed with Hopkins record or anything, but he clearly looked way better between the Trinidad and Glen Johnson fights than he did at old age. between that time, it was rare that he lost rounds, even if his competition wasnt outstanding. after that time, he was losing rounds to guys like Jermain Taylor, Howard Eastman, a blown up Oscar De La Hoya, and I thought he lost against a blown up Winky Wright.
                      clearly, he is not in his prime.
                      this is Hopkins at his best

                      this is Hopkins when he was getting on in years. you wouldnt see him fight so lousy when he was younger...

                      hehe, I love this damn video. cant help but to show it any chance I get.

                      anyways, Hopkins was better in his prime than when he was an old man. I dont know how this is even debatable.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP