Mayweather & Hatton: Adversity Means Very Little

[Wiley Hyena]

That is also something I would bet on. Agreed.

If I'm picking against Mayweather I'm picking by dec.

I can see picking Hatton by KO/TKO. But, not by decision. If it goes to a decision, the odds are that Floyd wins. IMO

[Azteca]

Addison is wrong abotu his analysis of Floyd Mayweather. He does not have the best offense in the sport. Period. He is the best at blending both offense and defense to create an almost unbeatable fighter. I said almost.

JMM for my money is the best offensive fighter we have today. He is much more fluid then Floyd with great technique and he throws alot of combinations. Something we dont usually see with today's brand of fighters.

And Hopkins for my money is the best defensive fighter. He does not slip in and out of range and throw one punch at a time like Floyd Mayweather. If you compared compubox stats...Hopkins at 43 probably outlands and outthrows Floyd in each of there major fights. I would be willing to bet.

Someone do it....

[Addison]

i think if haten can connect with floyd's body early, he'll put his ass down on the canvas, maybe even knock him the **** out, if that is, he can cut off the ring or trap pbf in a corner and plant his feet to do the damage

"kill the body and the head will die"

remember, haten made jl castillo quit

Interesting. Have you always felt Mayweather is vulnerable to the body?

[Addison]

I can see picking Hatton by KO/TKO. But, not by decision. If it goes to a decision, the odds are that Floyd wins. IMO

I feel the opposite.

[Addison]

Addison is wrong abotu his analysis of Floyd Mayweather. He does not have the best offense in the sport. Period. He is the best at blending both offense and defense to create an almost unbeatable fighter. I said almost.

JMM for my money is the best offensive fighter we have today. He is much more fluid then Floyd with great technique and he throws alot of combinations. Something we dont usually see with today's brand of fighters.

And Hopkins for my money is the best defensive fighter. He does not slip in and out of range and throw one punch at a time like Floyd Mayweather. If you compared compubox stats...Hopkins at 43 probably outlands and outthrows Floyd in each of there major fights. I would be willing to bet.

Someone do it....

I DIDN'T SAY HE WAS THE BEST!

Where are you getting that from?

I said he has one of the best offensive aresnals in the sport.

Which is a ****ing FACT. Period.

[Azteca]

I DIDN'T SAY HE WAS THE BEST!

Where are you getting that from?

I said he has one of the best offensive aresnals in the sport.

Which is a ****ing FACT. Period.

Nah. you just dont know boxing. I dont call throwing a punch at a time as a great 'offensive fighter'. Even against limited plodders like Baldomir he does the same thing.

[Azteca]

And that clip reminds me how weak Corley is. He is built like a teenage girl. Look at how he is throwing those power shots. They could not knock down a midget. Floyd probably whipped him good when they were sparring partners before they evenetually met up and fought. Corley is intimidated from the get go and just hit him with a lukcy shot.

If Hatton happens to buzz Hatton the same...Floyd is in for a world of hurt.

[Addison]

Nah. you just dont know boxing. I dont call throwing a punch at a time as a great 'offensive fighter'. Even against limited plodders like Baldomir he does the same thing.

No, you don't know what the **** you're talking about, fool.

Read the posts again.

Nobody said that ****. Get it straight.


Go ahead and share your little opinion about his offense..

Take up your argument with the multitudes of experts, fans, and pundits.

They ALL disagree with you.


I could give a **** about Mayweather being considered anything.

[Azteca]

90% huh... That's a pretty high number. I'm surprised his record isn't 0-38.


Anyway..

Mayweather's offensive ability has NOTHING to do with any of this ****.


I thought I was going to hear a technical analysis.. Apparently NOT.

You don't like Mayweather's evasive style.. Understood.

That doesn't mean squat. His offense is among the best in the sport.

FACT.

Just semantics. Relax, psycho.

Anyway, you dont know about boxing. Have you ever actually fought amateur or trained? It's quite obvious you havent...as your pointing to 'experts' opinions and acting like they are fact. The majority of 'experts' in boxing...don't know jack. Borges, Chuck Johnson, etc. Nothing. Jack. Zilch. Nada.

[Addison]

Just semantics. Relax, psycho.

Anyway, you dont know about boxing. Have you ever actually fought amateur or trained? It's quite obvious you havent...as your pointing to 'experts' opinions and acting like they are fact. The majority of 'experts' in boxing...don't know jack. Borges, Chuck Johnson, etc. Nothing. Jack. Zilch. Nada.

I don't know anything about Boxing???

And how the **** do you figure that, moron? :wank:

Did it only take you looking at one of my posts to decipher that?


You have made three assertions, and all three of them are INCORRECT.


Not one ****ing word you have typed has any bearing on reality.

Not one.

You are ****ing clown.

**** off clown.