Why do people think shavers hit so much harder than tyson?.
Collapse
-
i mean what was he like compared to foreman and liston on the bag?.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yup. He threw combo's that were hard-hitting (from the looks and sound of them) but he never threw a single punch and then backed off. Foreman did that. He threw some wide-ass, clubby hooks that looked much harder than Tyson's shots. But IMO, Tyson was more effective with his power because it was harder to neutralize in the ring. Those flurries still ****ed you up, big time.Comment
-
do you think if tyson loaded with one shot on the heavy bag he would hit it as hard as foreman?.Yup. He threw combo's that were hard-hitting (from the looks and sound of them) but he never threw a single punch and then backed off. Foreman did that. He threw some wide-ass, clubby hooks that looked much harder than Tyson's shots. But IMO, Tyson was more effective with his power because it was harder to neutralize in the ring. Those flurries still ****ed you up, big time.Comment
-
I don't buy that. Lots of guys have fast hands with no power and lots of guys have slow hands with oodles of power. The "scientific" formula about mass doesn't apply to punches, unless you're trying to justify your tae-bo kicks.speed= powerComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
foreman's heavy hands were amazing on the heavy bag. he'd put a dent in it the size of a watermelon. were talking a 150 lb heavy bag. of course tyson was a much sharper snappier puncher,,,but wasnt nearly as powerful a puncher as foremanComment
Comment