This thread isn't worth the time we've invested in it. We almost universally recognize Shavers as a harder puncher than Tyson and we have many reasons for doing this. The diminished effect his punches had on opponents once he lost his defensive style that enabled him to throw sneaky, lightning fast counter-punches (granted he still hit hard after that point, but nothing like Shavers), the testimony of his opponents who usually had guys like Ruddock and Morrison hitting harder, and finally the fact that if he truly hit as hard as Shavers, while having the skills and quickness he possessed, he would have been actually killing guys.
At the end of the day, the consensus of opinion of boxing historians who devote their lives to the study of this sport holds Shavers in higher regards than Tyson in the field of power punching and I'll take their opinion over any argument anyone here has proposed on this thread so far.
At the end of the day, the consensus of opinion of boxing historians who devote their lives to the study of this sport holds Shavers in higher regards than Tyson in the field of power punching and I'll take their opinion over any argument anyone here has proposed on this thread so far.
Comment