Who cares if Pep was looking to get paid, his record speaks for itself. Mayweather's record is nothing special, except for in the context of his own era. Good record for 2006 but zoom out and get a look at the bigger picture and suddenly it's underwhelming.
The people hugging Mayweather's nuts often have little historical perspective. They are usually the same people who actually think Evander Holyfield was the heavyweight champion of the world 4-5 times or whatever the newest number is (maybe Oquendo had been given some kind of belt for coming out of retirement which would bump it up one
).
Mayweather is the best fighter today. Period. That's it though. I don't see how he's any better than Roy Jones Jr., Pernell Whitaker, Cesar Chavez, Bernard Hopkins, or even James Toney. I certainly don't think he's better than Ray Leonard or Roberto Duran. I've only gone back 30 years or so and I've already named some guys who I think were better or at least equal pound for pound fighters. He'll need many more victories to prove himself above these guys, and that's just the begining. There are so many greats, SO MANY, in the history of gloved fighting, that to announce Mayweather as anything better than the best of his time, currently, is such a profoundly shortsighted and irritating statement that I have to respond with anger, as a fan of boxing and a student of it's history.
I don't hate Mayweather, but I don't think he's all that great. Best fighter today? Okay, fine but Pacquaio is catching up to even that claim. But ever? Come on, put down the pipe, the dust, the bottle, or whatever the hell you're on. He's done very well so far, and is on the path to greatness, but he's not even close yet. Not even close.
The people hugging Mayweather's nuts often have little historical perspective. They are usually the same people who actually think Evander Holyfield was the heavyweight champion of the world 4-5 times or whatever the newest number is (maybe Oquendo had been given some kind of belt for coming out of retirement which would bump it up one
).Mayweather is the best fighter today. Period. That's it though. I don't see how he's any better than Roy Jones Jr., Pernell Whitaker, Cesar Chavez, Bernard Hopkins, or even James Toney. I certainly don't think he's better than Ray Leonard or Roberto Duran. I've only gone back 30 years or so and I've already named some guys who I think were better or at least equal pound for pound fighters. He'll need many more victories to prove himself above these guys, and that's just the begining. There are so many greats, SO MANY, in the history of gloved fighting, that to announce Mayweather as anything better than the best of his time, currently, is such a profoundly shortsighted and irritating statement that I have to respond with anger, as a fan of boxing and a student of it's history.
I don't hate Mayweather, but I don't think he's all that great. Best fighter today? Okay, fine but Pacquaio is catching up to even that claim. But ever? Come on, put down the pipe, the dust, the bottle, or whatever the hell you're on. He's done very well so far, and is on the path to greatness, but he's not even close yet. Not even close.
Comment