Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

prime marciano vs. 2003 james toney

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Ascended View Post
    Not dangerous vs a guy with tech of 90s which he never faced anyone that advanced, rock looks novice like can you not see that? can you not see the many mistakes? Compared?,I can post his match with jersey agian
    So James' injury would not be a factor while he's carrying all of that extra weight?

    ...............Rockin'

    Comment


    • #82
      Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

      So James' injury would not be a factor while he's carrying all of that extra weight?

      ...............Rockin'
      Vs a guy with tech and flaws of a 40s fighter? No

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Ascended View Post
        1 punch with horrible tech? Funny, rock wouldn't get anywhere fighting that horrible, he never even hit anyone 1 good time and they were out where did you get that from?

        I don't have to ever have boxed if I understand tech and flaws of a older era which boxers who fought way more advanced people, are you slow?

        If you see all the flaws and horrible tech it should be obvious then tone would stop him before he even can react, tone is way to advanced, rock even got dropped by jersey easy in the 1st, that was cause he stood there defense bad and slow reflexes
        It's obvious that you've never boxed with all of the assumptions that you make.

        .................Rockin'

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

          It's obvious that you've never boxed with all of the assumptions that you make.

          .................Rockin'
          You're a idiot and very slow if I can see multiple mistakes and obsolete tech a older era has its common sense they would be easily destroyed by a way more advanced one, boxers even in 70s seen the rock era was horrible in tech
          compared cause they were way more advanced

          So why are you saying I haven't boxed as if that means something If boxers on video prove me as right their tech is way more advanced, they obviously seen the era before was obsolete and needed advancing you're slow

          Did I not post 14 match ver of tone? And a older one at a lhw he advanced did he not?, why did he do that?, he did it so he could still compete he knew he needed to, the same way rock would need to a lot he would see he has to many obsolete tech and flaws it wouldn't get him anywhere

          Walk into any gym trying to fight somebody who has been boxing for 5 years using tech and flaws rock did, tell me you don't end up koed in the 1st and fast
          Last edited by Ascended; 02-04-2024, 12:43 AM.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by Ascended View Post
            You're a idiot and very slow if I can see multiple mistakes and obsolete tech a older era has its common sense they would be easily destroyed by a way more advanced one, boxers even in 70s seen the rock era was horrible in tech compared cause they were way more advanced
            It's also obvious that you have never been punched by a 10oz professional boxing glove being worn by a strong professional fighter.

            And back in Rockys era, they'd fight with 8 oz gloves.

            ..............Rockin'
            Last edited by Rockin'; 02-04-2024, 12:42 AM.

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

              It's also obvious that you have never been punched by a 10oz professional boxing glove being worn by a strong professional fighter.

              And back in Rockys era, they'd fight with 8 oz gloves.

              ..............Rockin'
              Again as I said with horrible tech so that makes no sense to brag on another dumb comment, tech and flaws of a 40s fighter not a 90s one big difference, those guys and 70s koed people way faster and looked way better doing it
              Last edited by Ascended; 02-04-2024, 12:46 AM.

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Ascended View Post

                Again with horrible tech so that makes no sense to brag on another dumb comment
                I'd bet that you've never eaten a shot with an 8 oz glove.

                Nor any shot with any sized glove

                You claiming my ignorance only magnifies your ignorance.

                No fight know nothin'.

                You're beginning to bore me again.

                ..............Rockin'
                Last edited by Rockin'; 02-04-2024, 12:50 AM.

                Comment


                • #88
                  Sheet, if we're just time traveling I got Marvin Hagler and Thomas Hearns both over Jack Johnson...........Rockin'
                  Last edited by Rockin'; 02-04-2024, 03:09 AM.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by Rockin' View Post

                    I'd bet that you've never eaten a shot with an 8 oz glove.

                    Nor any shot with any sized glove

                    You claiming my ignorance only magnifies your ignorance.

                    No fight know nothin'.

                    You're beginning to bore me again.

                    ..............Rockin'
                    Back to the gloves size hurts huh knowing 70s were way more advanced, I did a couple rounds in high school for fun, I didn't claim anything I said for a fact a idiot and can't see good
                    Last edited by Ascended; 02-04-2024, 01:05 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Arthel Lawhorn over Jack Johnson. Bam could fight doe..............Rockin'
                      Last edited by Rockin'; 02-06-2024, 01:03 AM.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP