Vinny Paz KOs Floyd Mayweather or get ducked!

[IronDanHamza]

The MFer flat out called himself a coward. He's a coward. It's more direct to the point in the other video he did with fight hype, where the questioner is trying to mock the coward allegations but shockingly Floyd brags that he's a coward. Incredible confession. Find it. I tried to share link here but it wouldn't post the link here.

Can't you read? I've just laid out to you exactly what was said, with the context you conveninetly left out.

He says "If I'm such a coward. Why do you want to watch me?"

He's mocking the laughable notion that an elite, P4P #1 boxer is being deemed a coward.

The FightHype video is even more so;

The first statement is "I laugh about it" What do you think that means, Sherlock?

The entire subject matter of that FightHype video is how ridiculous the notion is. You're so painfully stupid you can't even see that

[IronDanHamza]

Cotto's first loss was to Pacquiao if I remember correctly. 154 150 147 it's all the same really. Pac wanted that 8th title. If you're asserting four pounds saved Manny vs Cotto, that's just silly.

I guess Margarito smashing Cotto's face in and stopping him a year prior didn't happen.

You don't know shit.

[Haka]

He actually lost the fight.

You should look it up.

On the rigged cards. Has there never been a fight where the wrong side got the decision ? Lots of them, I consider that fight amongst those.

[IronDanHamza]

On the rigged cards. Has there never been a fight where the wrong side got the decision ? Lots of them, I consider that fight amongst those.

Because you're retarded.

[Haka]

Because you're retarded.

You have down syndrome

[IronDanHamza]

You have down syndrome

Yes you have shared a link to a fight that Mayweather won.

Cong****, you thick cunt.

[Bennyleonard99]

I guess Margarito smashing Cotto's face in and stopping him a year prior didn't happen.

You don't know shit.

Margarito vs Cotto was after Pac vs Cotto right? Whatever, Cotto lost leverage after losing to Pac and Margarito. When he fought Floyd he was the B side and vulnerable to take dictation from the boss. "If you want the ten million you gotta play soft and let me take the decision."

[IronDanHamza]

Margarito vs Cotto was after Pac vs Cotto right? Whatever, Cotto lost leverage after losing to Pac and Margarito. When he fought Floyd he was the B side and vulnerable to take dictation from the boss. "If you want the ten million you gotta play soft and let me take the decision."

Sure was......if you think 2008 was after 2009

Fucking retard.

[Haka]

Clearly Maidana being the agressor, ring general, landing the clearer shots and the ref gets in the way of further punishment giving help to the opponent.

[Willie Pep 229]

I would say Mayweather landed the cleaner punches (mostly counters).

Maidana was more than just the agressor, he controlled the pacing of thd fight.

I am a guy who does not believe in scoring 10-9 rounds, so in my purist universe (based on these highlights) I would score this fight a "no decision" and leave the NSW to make the call for the gamblers.

I didn't see either man 'win' that fight.

But then again I seldom do.

I have used this as an example before, but to me the FOC was a two round victory for Frazier (11th & 15th). The other 13 rounds were too close to bother scoring for one guy over the other.

I don't see how either of you can see a victorious fighter in the fight highlighted above.

Neither fighter ever dominated a round, never mind dominated the fight.

IMHO When you watch a round and then have to say, well my criteria consists of "ring generalship, effective aggression," Etc. and then scored it 10-9 based on 'your criteria,' the truth is, you likely just watched another even round and then you forced a 10-9 score on to it.

You know when a fighter truly wins a round, it is obvious and you don't need to invent or revert to a self-created criteria to justify it.

I saw no winner above, but I seldom do.