The reason for Lewis' forced vacation of the WBA belt is misunderstood. Using the wayback machine I have found the 6th March 2000 resolution granting an exception to fight Michael Grant (WBA #5) who was HBO's favoured next opponent for Lewis.
Lewis was ultimately forced to vacate the belt by court order after he unsuccessfully argued that the step aside clause in the Holyfield rematch contract specified Akinwande as the opponent (who was dropped from the rankings due to illness) rather than the WBA #1 who ended up being John Ruiz.
This was a pivotal moment in heavyweight history for a number of reasons:
Lewis was ultimately forced to vacate the belt by court order after he unsuccessfully argued that the step aside clause in the Holyfield rematch contract specified Akinwande as the opponent (who was dropped from the rankings due to illness) rather than the WBA #1 who ended up being John Ruiz.
This was a pivotal moment in heavyweight history for a number of reasons:
- It initiated a series of uninteresting fights between Holyfield and Ruiz for that particular belt.
- The WBA implemented their despised 'super champion' (two-tier belt) policy soon after.
- The WBA heavyweight title never really regained credibility until Klitschko won it from Haye in 2011.
Comment