The steroid rumours were basically started by Mayweather's team. So if Armstrong was about to fight Mayweather, considering he would've gone from a champion at featherweight to welterweight, they would probably ask him, too.
It could happen. This is a tough fight for both, IMO. Pacquiao's the best opponent Clottey has faced and Clottey is going to be the biggest (weight) opponent Pacquiao's faced.
Dallas Stadium? I'm surprised.
And Margarito on the undercard? I don't respect the guy but I wanna see if the Mosley fight was a fluke or if was he really just bad without plaster.
I think he'll still be looking for a fight with Mayweather. The fight just has to happen. It's between the two best fighters of the last decade and the fans wanna know who's the best.
The earliest that fight would happen would be in May. I don't think Pacquiao wants to wait that long.
Plus, I personally think that Mosley would give Pacquiao more problems than Clottey would.
If you're talking about all-time great heavyweights, then all the scenarios work, in my opinion.
Will either of them get done? That remains to be seen.
Amir Khan hasnt even announced his next opponent yet so dont hate. You can start hating on him when his next opponent is sh*t. untill that time plz stfu
Unless he fight Bradley, Hatton or Maidana, I'm not impressed.
You just owned your own thread TS.
Sorry, Adrianna. I know you that you have problems computing with higher intelligence, which is why you made a thread saying Pacquiao beats Clottey with ease.
Pac did this to Cotto:
http://pacquiao-vs-cotto.cebuspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Miguel-Cotto-after-Firepower.jpg
He also won, whereas Clottey lost. Your triangle theory makes no sense.
Perhaps you should've read my last post before you posted this. Here it is, again:
This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.
You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.
Pac did this to Cotto:
http://pacquiao-vs-cotto.cebuspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Miguel-Cotto-after-Firepower.jpg
He also won, whereas Clottey lost. Your triangle theory makes no sense.
You posted this right after my last post, so here it is:
This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.
You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.
This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.
You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.
I agree. He's about how to have his second fight in a row that involves a welterweight title. It's not fair to the others of the 140 division like Bradley, Khan, etc.
But we all know Marg was cheating vs Cotto.
I suspect it too but there's no proof of it. In the end, Margarito was the man and Mosley beat Margarito. That's why he's the number one welterweight.