After his loss to Cotto in 2007? I always think back to that fight, I thought Cotto won clearly in a good fight. If he lost to Cotto who in turn got destroyed by Pac, how can Mosley go and say he's better than Pac or Mayweather?
Shane is still todays #1 WW
and for all does people saying cotto beat shane
cotto beat shane 2007 thus cotto=1WW
margarito beat cotto 2008 plastered or unplastered thus Margarito=1WW
Shane beat Margarito 2009 thus SHANE=1WW
Its the way you beat em...Mosley-Cotto was a close fight.
And Margs is an accused/proven cheater. It's in the way you lost too.
I'm not saying I don't back Mosley as the best WW, I'm just saying the logic is flawed.
But we all know Marg was cheating vs Cotto.
I suspect it too but there's no proof of it. In the end, Margarito was the man and Mosley beat Margarito. That's why he's the number one welterweight.
Without a lineal champion, Cotto was the man to beat. Tony beat him, then Shane beat Tony. Shane is the man to beat at WW now. Pac didn't deserve to leapfrog him in the ratings imo for beating Cotto. We just need to see him face either Pac or Floyd since those 2 are too bitchy to face each other.
cause he destroyed the guy who 1st destroyed cotto.. lol.. it's all ****ed up.. But i think mosley deserves to be the no. 1 WW.. the elite WW's are fighting each other guess who is sitting at the bench watching..