Pacquiao fought Cotto and he ended up walking away with a bandaged head.
http://insidesports.ph/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pacquiao-with-bandage.jpg
Clottey fought Cotto and didn't have a scratch on him. This is what he did to Cotto:
http://edmulholland.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/cotto016.jpg
So please do not say that Pacquiao will win easily. That is nonsense.
Pacquiao fought Cotto and he ended up walking away with a bandaged head.
http://insidesports.ph/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pacquiao-with-bandage.jpg
Clottey fought Cotto and didn't have a scratch on him. This is what he did to Cotto:
http://edmulholland.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/cotto016.jpg
So please do not say that Pacquiao will win easily. That is nonsense.
wow. thats stupid even for a triangle theory. bandaged head or not pac didnt really struggle at all with cotto.
eighter way styles make fights. pac will never lose to someone who simply tries to overpower him. anytime someone stands right in front of him flatfooted pac is gonna pick him apart. clottey is tailor made for pac and manny will destroy him. it doesnt take a whole lot of boxing knowledge to understand it.
Unlike Cotto, Clottey has a strong right hand and throws good straight right hand leads. We all know how Pac's face is a magnet for straight right hands. (Part of the same reason that I would favor Floyd 55/45 or 60/40 over Pac, that is if Floyd ever grows some pubic hair and gets in the ring with Pac.)
Won't be easy for Pac.
Pacquiao fought Cotto and he ended up walking away with a bandaged head.
http://insidesports.ph/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pacquiao-with-bandage.jpg
Clottey fought Cotto and didn't have a scratch on him. This is what he did to Cotto:
http://edmulholland.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/cotto016.jpg
So please do not say that Pacquiao will win easily. That is nonsense.
That was from a headbutt. Cotto fought most of the fight with 1 eye...how quickly people refrain from mentioning this.
Pacquiao fought Cotto and he ended up walking away with a bandaged head.
http://insidesports.ph/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/pacquiao-with-bandage.jpg
Clottey fought Cotto and didn't have a scratch on him. This is what he did to Cotto:
http://edmulholland.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/cotto016.jpg
So please do not say that Pacquiao will win easily. That is nonsense.
To be perfectly honest the only major damage done to Cotto by Clottey was due to a headbutt, but I do agree it will be a tough fight.
Clottey is tough and can bang so this will be an interesting fight, it will def be more entertaining than whatever bum Flyod fights UNLESS its Williams which wont happen.
Pac did this to Cotto:
http://pacquiao-vs-cotto.cebuspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Miguel-Cotto-after-Firepower.jpg
He also won, whereas Clottey lost. Your triangle theory makes no sense.
You posted this right after my last post, so here it is:
This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.
You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.
Only one that say Clottey is going to be easy
Are Floyd fans..
I was about to post the same thing.
Check this out.
This floyd "fan" thinks Clottey is a joke as an opponent for PAC
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=346127
But he's defending Mallignaggi as the next opponent for Floyd.
Originally Posted by Adrian 28
Paulie is very fast and very skilled and has great movement. Its a style Floyds never faced before.
:lol1:
That's what I call a Flomo!
You just owned your own thread TS.
Sorry, Adrianna. I know you that you have problems computing with higher intelligence, which is why you made a thread saying Pacquiao beats Clottey with ease.
Pac did this to Cotto:
http://pacquiao-vs-cotto.cebuspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Miguel-Cotto-after-Firepower.jpg
He also won, whereas Clottey lost. Your triangle theory makes no sense.
Perhaps you should've read my last post before you posted this. Here it is, again:
This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.
You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.
Pac did this to Cotto:
http://pacquiao-vs-cotto.cebuspace.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/Miguel-Cotto-after-Firepower.jpg
He also won, whereas Clottey lost. Your triangle theory makes no sense.
This isn't a triangle theory. Clottey and Cotto are similar. They both have a peek-a-boo like defense, except Clottey's is better. Both come in with their heads, except Clottey does more.
You're basically looking at all the stuff that gave Pacquiao problems but to a more severe degree.
Exactly! As a Pacfan Im not downplaying Clottey at all. I've only heard from the other side saying he's tailor-made for Pac and will lose easily. He wouldn't be a top WW if he was easy for anybody.
Clottey has a great chin and has WW power.. so he can beat Pac just like any top WW..
Real boxing fans,not just Pacman or floyd fans,but real fans who follow the sport know that Clottey isn't an easy night for any superstar welterweight!!