It didn't backfire, I knew that "the myth" of Floyd's accuracy compared to Pacquiao's existed and I knew people heard it many time without actually looking at the figures or even taking not how each fighter fights.
I knew most people would find it difficult to shift their beliefs especially when I'm telling them the opposite of what they have been told.
But I knew that Mayweather would accuracy would come down a lot las night and maybe then some more people could see the truth.
Typical Pacta*d. You are trying to make "more people see the truth" using an incorrect calculation. The Gambler showed you the correct way to calculate connect percentage over a series of fights but like a typical inflexible Pacta*d you will not accept that the method you used was incorrect. If you cannot do simple math I suggest you go back to elementary school and stay there.
http://www.boxingscene.com/compubox-plus-minus-ratings-active-fighters--52564
Like I said, typical Pacta*d, giving misleading information. The link you provided does NOT calculate connect percentages the way you did. Although it does not explicitly describe how, it does say that "Mayweather connected on 46% of his TOTAL punches over his last 9 fights" (I am paraphrasing). This suggests that they calculated connect percentages as the number of punches landed divided by the number of punches thrown over 9 fights - a correct method. Notice that Pacquia is only at 38%, so you are trying to use uneducated calculations to mislead as to how he is better. Typical Pacta*d. The link you provided exposed your ignorance.
Tell that to compubox, they use the same method I do, fool.
Please provide the link where compubox calculates connect percentage over a series of fights as an unweighted average? And if it did, you appear to be too simple-minded not to see a problem with that. You don't see that a one-punch knockout (100% connect percentage for that flight ) would unduly inflate the average, leading to a misleading connect percentage?
Who is the greatest showman to step in the ring? For me its a toss up between Hamed and RJJ, as much as I love how Roy embarrasses his opponents i have to go with Hamed. Nobody does a Hamed entranced or danced as much during the fight. I cannot comment on Ali as i was not yet around when he was still fighting and i find him more of a showman outside the ring than in it.
Greatest showman ever? Jesse Joe Walcott, without a doubt.
Have you considered the possibility that the contract your pal Arum sent to Floyd was so insulting it deserved no reply? Could this be the reason for his silence?