How do you know that, and don't tell me Arum said so..
put ur foot on tim's shoes and see if you'll talk about a mayweather-pac fight, even if you think you are winning...
Bradley: Mayweather'll never stop him (VIDEO)
Bradley, after the fight, admitted that he lost.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxVHLuly1sc&feature=share
Reality is there's no more fighter out there for Paq. Clotty has set the tone, interrrupted briefly by Margarito, then resumed by Mosly. These challengers just won't come forward unless The Champ Paqciao do so. Paqman is always forced to press the action because nothing happens if he didn't. You'll hear people booing. Paqman got tired of it that he's stopped doing it in his last fight. There's nowhere in a Paq fight would you see Paq motioning the opponent to come in as many times as in this Bradly fight. The challenger just won't come forward. They're behaving like they are the champs trying to protect their belts.
That's why Paqciao either retires or just pick whomever he chooses and fight for exhibition purposes. Floyd won't fight him so there's no point in mentioning that fight.
this.......
this rematch is not even worth watching. we all know pac won, why waste another fight with bradley when there's more out there to fight...i'd say pac should change promoter, in that way we would see that dream fight we've all been waiting for...
i want MAYWEATHER and MARQUEZ in the same year, either of the 2 could be first so that MAYWEATHER fans would stop *****ing about PAC ducking. and MARQUEZ fans as seeing it as MARQUEZ already too old to fight...
LOL!
The excuses begin!
even if it was intentional it doesn't mean sht, i really can't seem to care, the rounds marquez won he won, who cares about stupid footstomping
Judges and compubox might have been biased. But for Harold Lederman to also have it in Manny's favor??? I'm guessing you're also thinking that he was on Arum's payroll along with Max Kellerman, Jim Lampley and Emmanuel Stewart...
LOL!
The excuses begin!
Just so you know, I thought Marquez won that fight. Had to rewatch it to see the fight round by round and had it 116-113 with this breakdown:
1 - PAC
2 - JMM
3 - PAC
4 - PAC
5 - JMM
6 - PAC
7 - JMM
8 - *draw
9 - PAC
10 - PAC
11 - JMM
12 - PAC
Why don't you be a boxing fan and stop hating mo PAC just because Marquez had claims of winning the first 2 fights.
give it up pactards all of you are looking like morons with all of these stupid excuses.
as i've mentioned earlier, flomo, i had it in favor of manny. no reason to make excuses...you just couldn't accept the fact that the judges, the compubox, harold lederman all see it in manny's favor...you might want to rewatch it...
how do you know there wasn't? you watched them both that closely?
yes, i did...and just in case you have no copy of it, 2008 fight is still on youtube and you could watch there first fight from here...
http://www.allthebestfights.com/pacquiao-vs-marquez-full-fight-video-pelea-2004/
If you knew anything about boxing then you'd know this happens in all orthodox/southpaw fights. It's only being brought to attention for this fight as Pac fans are desperate to find an excuse.
Pac never complained, Roach never complained. Because it happens all the time.
Just so you know, I scored it 116-113 in Manny's favor with this breakdown:
1 - PAC
2 - JMM
3 - PAC
4 - PAC
5 - JMM
6 - PAC
7 - JMM
8 - *draw
9 - PAC
10 - PAC
11 - JMM
12 - PAC
I believe you already have a copy of it. Why don't you watch it again...
PHOTO: Manuel "The Footstooper" Marquez
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s720x720/310284_10150474104495041_703130040_11040548_483462857_n.jpg
nobody can force anything to floyd.
if he wants to fight pacquiao's sparring partner, that's what floyd is gonna do.
well, since WBC would intervene if there would be an issue on the negotiation due to arum-mayweather conflict. at least we would know if this is really an arum-mayweather conflict or someone's been ducking someone...
I think this is the gist of the problem that they have with this testing.
Why all of a sudden should they have to do something that has never been done before, without any factual reason to do so?
I would understand the concern if:
1) Manny Pacquiao hadn't passed ever single drug test he's taken
2) The NSAC's drug testing has been in question
But the basis of the argument was on an assumption, that a fighter could not possibly be performing the way that he has per Floyd Mayweather Sr.
i strongly agree.
So f*cking what if neither test is foolproof? One of them is primitive while the other one, at the very least, is a START. Not giving in to Floyd's demands? The irony of a Pacquiao apologist spewing this crap. If you agree to OLYMPIC STYLED TESTING, THEN YOU AGREE. You can't decide when and which tests you'd like to take, wtf? That's PACQUIAO STYLED TESTING. Jesus Christ, you clowns disgust me. Luckily, most of you will disappear when he retired because you damn sure aren't boxing fans.
there is already a standard for testing you f*ck. and we have to change it because some family of crackheads said so? and you dare call yourself a boxing fan???
In my opinion I agree with the olympic testing for all fights. I believe each fight should be tested so skill and ability will determine the outcome not plaster or PED oranything else. Pacshould take the testing to erase all doubt. The real reason mayweather came back was to erase all doubt of who is p4p number 1. Only way to prove it is confront the situation.
and he will take that p4p back by weighing more than what's been agreed.but hey, roach already knows he's gonna do that, that's why roach is asking for a 10mil penalty to "who of the two violates it". that's why this crackheads are asking for the test 2 days b4 the fight coz they know this could have some psychocological effect on pac come fight night.seriously, is this your way of testing a boxer's skill and ability?