Bradley took rds 1 - 3
Pac "suspectly" took rds 4 -5 (after a brutal shot in the 4th that caused bradley to twist his ankle)
Rounds 6 through 12 is a toss up, however bradley stuck with the jab all night stayed aggressive and landed some decent shots down the stretch.
I felt manny could have won this fight, however it seems he felt in his mind that those last mintue inaccurate flurries that gets the crowd going would have sealed the deal. thats just not the case, bradley landed the cleaner shots with the jab all night.... NEVER TRUST HBO COMP....BOX With a healed ankle and the way bradley adjusted to manny's style down the stretch I honestly dnt think a rematch would be in manny's best interest.
I think Tim was caught up in the limelight. It was his first PPV headline, biggest fight and payday of his life. Even with the twisted/broken ankles, he made Pac miss a ton of shots and outboxed him most of the fight.
If they ever fought again, I think Tim would have a different game plan and stick to boxing from the outside with the jab the whole fight. He would be leaning to his left to avoid Manny's straight left and countering with the straight right more.
He really didn't do bad the first time with bad ankles, so I think he will look markedly better in a rematch.
lmfaaooo at broken ankles.
I have to disagree with you bro,Bradley won the fight because of his aggressiveness and his boxing ability..He has to find a happy medium...I always said,imo JMM does not have a win over Pac because he is too passive during the fight..He only answers to what Pac does,judges see this and feel it's Pac making the fight..Yet with Morales and Bradley,they were both aggressive(although they did box to)they pushed the issue..I think Bradley needs that same fight again to beat Pac..Just without the hurt ankles...
I think it was a close fight but Tim had the hurt ankles, without them he does much much better. The next time there won't be any question at all. I think he clearly outboxed Pac but wasn't able to control the fight in a way that would have made those last 30 second spurts by Pac irrelevant IMO. There were close rounds where I thought Pac's late surges were just enough to win the round. If Tim's ankles were solid, he would have made Pac look silly the entire round.
Tim definitely won the last 4 rounds and I had him winning virtually every other round up until the last minute when Pac would turn it on. There won't be a rematch but if there is, my money is definitely going on Tim again for sure. I can see where someone could have Tim winning all those close rounds, I just gave Pac a few more of them than to Tim because Tim couldn't sit down on his punches like he needed to.....next time he will for sure.
http://boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?cat=boxer&human_id=6129
"After a thorough review by five veteran judges commissioned by the WBO, Pacquiao was declared the unanimous decision winner by the panel"
was this really necessary?
http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lqr3sm6XgY1qg7ie3.gif
Yes he did and I just pointed out most of the clean shots landed by Bradley. I hardly saw any clean shots landed by Pacquiao maybe except in the last 39 seconds when a left pushed Bradley back, he also landed a right and a left on Bradley's head on the 1:42 mark. Oh and I never said Pacquiao landed only two punches, I was just pointing out the highlights of that round, not all the punches landed. Even if I pointed out all the punches landed by Pacquiao, Bradley still won that round CONVINCINGLY.
I stand by my statement, if you think otherwise than prove me wrong.
Pachater:mad:
We are judging fights by bruises now? Ah I was confused I thought there was a point system.
So if a guy get accidental headbutted but lands more solid accurate punches the whole fight he still deserves to lose because he had the bigger bruise.
Seems legit!
LOL.... gk bro
I think Tim was caught up in the limelight. It was his first PPV headline, biggest fight and payday of his life. Even with the twisted/broken ankles, he made Pac miss a ton of shots and outboxed him most of the fight.
If they ever fought again, I think Tim would have a different game plan and stick to boxing from the outside with the jab the whole fight. He would be leaning to his left to avoid Manny's straight left and countering with the straight right more.
He really didn't do bad the first time with bad ankles, so I think he will look markedly better in a rematch.
I have to disagree with you bro,Bradley won the fight because of his aggressiveness and his boxing ability..He has to find a happy medium...I always said,imo JMM does not have a win over Pac because he is too passive during the fight..He only answers to what Pac does,judges see this and feel it's Pac making the fight..Yet with Morales and Bradley,they were both aggressive(although they did box to)they pushed the issue..I think Bradley needs that same fight again to beat Pac..Just without the hurt ankles...
Pac knocks Timmy out next time.
I'd hope so, for a guy that "dominated the entire fight", he couldn't even give weak lil tiny Tim a black eye yet the pillow-fisted phenom somehow busted Pac's mouth up. :boxing:
I think Tim was caught up in the limelight. It was his first PPV headline, biggest fight and payday of his life. Even with the twisted/broken ankles, he made Pac miss a ton of shots and outboxed him most of the fight.
If they ever fought again, I think Tim would have a different game plan and stick to boxing from the outside with the jab the whole fight. He would be leaning to his left to avoid Manny's straight left and countering with the straight right more.
He really didn't do bad the first time with bad ankles, so I think he will look markedly better in a rematch.
It just appeared to me that you are not scoring it objectively ..... and making it look like Bradley won that round "convincingly" in which he didn't!
If you said it was a typo and that Manny landed more than 2 punches then you better fix what you wrote previously because what you stated was incorrect.
Yes he did and I just pointed out most of the clean shots landed by Bradley. I hardly saw any clean shots landed by Pacquiao maybe except in the last 39 seconds when a left pushed Bradley back, he also landed a right and a left on Bradley's head on the 1:42 mark. Oh and I never said Pacquiao landed only two punches, I was just pointing out the highlights of that round, not all the punches landed. Even if I pointed out all the punches landed by Pacquiao, Bradley still won that round CONVINCINGLY.
I stand by my statement, if you think otherwise than prove me wrong.
It was a typo I meant rounds 1, 3, 6, and 9. And Pacquiao landed more than two punches in that round, but those compubox stats are bogus. How did Pacquiao outland Bradley 26-9? Pacquiao did not land 26 pucnhes in round 7. I saw Bradley landing more cleaner shots than Pacquiao.
It just appeared to me that you are not scoring it objectively ..... and making it look like Bradley won that round "convincingly" in which he didn't!
If you said it was a typo and that Manny landed more than 2 punches then you better fix what you wrote previously because what you stated was incorrect.
man if only I had a youtube page I would show you you were dead wrong.
That punch that landed nothing but glove? It landed face and glove, those punches exist.
That flurry where you said he didn't land anything? he landed about 7-10 punches, watching it in slow motion and I am counting the ones I see, not ones hidden behind bradleys body.
That exchange where he landed two left hooks? They never even touched pacquiao
That body shot you said bradley landed? He was aiming for the uppercut, hit body instead, any boxer will tell you those punches are not effective at all
Are you just ignoring pacqiauo's landed shots? Because you are barely noting anything he did, and he did a lot more than you said
I'm not ignoring the shots Pacquiao landed, but Bradley landed more cleaner shots is the point I'm making, and if you rewatch that round, you can clearly see that.
The strait left that Pacquiao threw hit nothing but glove, the punch was nowhere near landing on Bradley's face.
I didn't see any clean punches landed during that flurry at all. He didn't land ****, except for one one punch, which was a grazing blow. And you are ignoring the two left hooks that Bradley landed.
So from your analysis, Manny landed only twice in round 7? lol!
You realize that you said that Bradley won round 7 convincingly but later on you said that it was a close round?
It was a typo I meant rounds 1, 3, 6, and 9. And Pacquiao did land more than two punches in that round but hardly any of them landed cleanly compared to Bradley, and those compubox stats are bogus. How did Pacquiao out-land Bradley 26-9? Pacquiao did not land 26 punches in round 7. I saw Bradley landing more cleaner shots than Pacquiao.
Lol people complain about the HBO commentators then they look for any and everything to give for Bradley.
How could you possibly say Bradley easily won that round. You think he won it whatever I disagree with you but I can live with that opinion but to say he EASILY won it??? Are you kidding me what did he do to have earned that round so clearly?
Okay explain to me how Pacquiao won that round?
The 7th round.
-In the start of the opening bell Bradley lands a couple body shots.
-2:29 Bradley lands a right hand to the body
-2:12 Bradley lands two body shots (a right and a left)
-2:09 Pacquiao lands a left punch to Bradley's body
-1:40 Pacquiao throws a straight left, lands nothing but glove.
-1:17 Huge flurry by Pacquiao. NONE of those punches landed. The only clean punches that landed during that exchange were two left hooks from Bradley at the start of 1:05
-0:53 Bradley lands a body shot while Pacquiao is moving.
-0:45 Bradley lands a left hook to the body. A couple seconds later a counter right-hand on Pacquiao's head, best of the punch the round.
-0:38 Pacquiao lands a left, a couple seconds later Bradley retaliates with a a left.
Bradley EASILY won that round.man if only I had a youtube page I would show you you were dead wrong.
That punch that landed nothing but glove? It landed face and glove, those punches exist.
That flurry where you said he didn't land anything? he landed about 7-10 punches, watching it in slow motion and I am counting the ones I see, not ones hidden behind bradleys body.
That exchange where he landed two left hooks? They never even touched pacquiao
That body shot you said bradley landed? He was aiming for the uppercut, hit body instead, any boxer will tell you those punches are not effective at all
Are you just ignoring pacqiauo's landed shots? Because you are barely noting anything he did, and he did a lot more than you said
The 7th round.
-In the start of the opening bell Bradley lands a couple body shots.
-2:29 Bradley lands a right hand to the body
-2:12 Bradley lands two body shots (a right and a left)
-2:09 Pacquiao lands a left punch to Bradley's body
-1:40 Pacquiao throws a straight left, lands nothing but glove.
-1:17 Huge flurry by Pacquiao. NONE of those punches landed. The only clean punches that landed during that exchange were two left hooks from Bradley at the start of 1:05
-0:53 Bradley lands a body shot while Pacquiao is moving.
-0:45 Bradley lands a left hook to the body. A couple seconds later a counter right-hand on Pacquiao's head, best of the punch the round.
-0:38 Pacquiao lands a left, a couple seconds later Bradley retaliates with a a left.
Bradley EASILY won that round.
Only a blind fool would think Pacquiao won 10-2. Bradley EASILY and I mean EASILY won rounds 10-12 convincingly. For example in the 11th round Bradley landed like 10 jabs and numerous body shots. In the 12th round, Bradley was landing on Pacquiao at will.
If you rewatch round 7, Bradley won that round convincingly. Rounds 1, 6, 7, and 9 were close. I gave rounds 1 and 3 to Bradley. I had round 6 a draw.
So that 115-114 to Bradley.
So from your analysis, Manny landed only twice in round 7? lol!
You realize that you said that Bradley won round 7 convincingly but later on you said that it was a close round?
The 7th round.
-In the start of the opening bell Bradley lands a couple body shots.
-2:29 Bradley lands a right hand to the body
-2:12 Bradley lands two body shots (a right and a left)
-2:09 Pacquiao lands a left punch to Bradley's body
-1:40 Pacquiao throws a straight left, lands nothing but glove.
-1:17 Huge flurry by Pacquiao. NONE of those punches landed. The only clean punches that landed during that exchange were two left hooks from Bradley at the start of 1:05
-0:53 Bradley lands a body shot while Pacquiao is moving.
-0:45 Bradley lands a left hook to the body. A couple seconds later a counter right-hand on Pacquiao's head, best of the punch the round.
-0:38 Pacquiao lands a left, a couple seconds later Bradley retaliates with a a left.
Bradley EASILY won that round.
Lol people complain about the HBO commentators then they look for any and everything to give for Bradley.
How could you possibly say Bradley easily won that round. You think he won it whatever I disagree with you but I can live with that opinion but to say he EASILY won it??? Are you kidding me what did he do to have earned that round so clearly?
The 7th round.
-In the start of the opening bell Bradley lands a couple body shots.
-2:29 Bradley lands a right hand to the body
-2:12 Bradley lands two body shots (a right and a left)
-2:09 Pacquiao lands a left punch to Bradley's body
-1:40 Pacquiao throws a straight left, lands nothing but glove.
-1:17 Huge flurry by Pacquiao. NONE of those punches landed. The only clean punches that landed during that exchange were two left hooks from Bradley at the start of 1:05
-0:53 Bradley lands a body shot while Pacquiao is moving.
-0:45 Bradley lands a left hook to the body. A couple seconds later a counter-right hand on Pacquiao's head, best of the punch the round.
-0:38 Pacquiao lands a left, a couple seconds later Bradley lands a left.
Bradley clearly won that round.
I gave that round to Bradley also.