Groves will become world champion, the McGuigan's are great trainers, Fitzpatrick is one of the worst trainers going along with Joe Gallagher. I also think Sturm is well passed so Chudinov beating him twice isn't that much of an incredible feat, if Darren Barker hadn't messed up his hip I would've had him to beat Sturm when they fought for Darren's IBF title. If Groves fights Chudinov I think he stops him.
Andre ward greater in every way.
Ward and Calzaghe both have the same style of fighting, whilst Ward is an exceptional boxer I feel it would be very close on points, Calzaghe is a very underrated boxer despite the accolades he achieved.
Roy Jones Jr. drops, busts up, and stops Calzaghe at 168. GGG probably gets the KO as well
I think Joe UDs both Ward and Froch.
Joe wasn't invincible, I would absolutely love to see all those fights, I don't rule him out of any of them, his head movement was phenomenal, his hand speed, I think he COULD win any of those fights theoretically.
Are white fighters more easily hyped? For example...
Imagine if Broner was white. People would respect him more, despite acting like a jerk, because it's bad for the white man's confidence to see a black man with so much confidence. My proof? McGregor is the most beloved personality in MMA at the moment and he acts worse than Broner!
Imagine if a black man did what Golovkin did. Fighting in a weak division for years and his best win is a guy who moved up two weight classes... People would say "he needs to prove himself!", "we don't know how good he is yet!", etc... My proof? Notice how white fans react to Joshua and Wilder, both knocking out lame opposition like Golovkin, but still not getting accepted. Joshua is actually fighting much better opposition now than Golovkin fought at that point in his career and Brook made Golovkin look lame. We don't know how good Golovkin is yet.
When a black man looks bad in a fight, like Ortiz in his last fight, people insist on him being exposed, just like they will say Wilder is exposed when he gets knocked out someday. Golovkin and Kovalev both looked absolutely horrible in their last fights. Golovkin got outboxed by Brook in the first two rounds and took too many punches, getting shaky legs (I should make a gif with that). But people start making excuses about it, lol. And Kovalev looked so amateurish against Chilemba, but it didn't keep white fans from insisting on him being able to KO Ward (who really is leagues above Chilemba).
There are countless of more examples, keep that in mind and think about it a bit before you base your answer on only the points I made above... The white fans need to start judging fighters by fair and objective criteria.
I think you're mistaking a casuals opinion to somebody who knows what they're talking about.
Joshua is currently the biggest hype job ever, that doesn't mean he isn't loved by the UK but his resume is awful, his biggest win is Dillian Whyte but he's adored by the whole country.
Golovkin is hyped but people who know what they're talking about wont forget to remind you his resume is also pretty **** and he hasn't fought any spectacular opposition.
Broner is a fool that's why people don't like him black or white, fool is fool.
And Ortiz recently fought somebody who continually ran away and didn't want to fight, he won one of the widest UD's I've ever seen so I don't really see the argument there...
Wilder is exposed and will get knocked out when he faces decent opposition, I just hope the same doesn't happen to Joshua :fingersx:
Obviously just speculation at this stage...
But if Groves beats Gutnecht and sets up another world title shot as somebody on here theorised the other day, potentially against Chudinov... Most including myself would expect him to win thus becoming world champ.
If Degale wins against Badou Jack which again I would presume him to do and then successfully defends his world titles when fighting Callum Smith (close one IMO)
Could this then set up a possible unification bout between Groves and Degale and can they settle their score once and for all?
There's a lot of ifs involved here but if it happened what do you think the outcome is and how possible is this scenario? (I think Groves wins a close decision again)
Good response mate
Relax your stance a bit more, bring your legs a little closer together, maybe bend your knees a bit more and try not to lean forward so much. Will feel a little more natural
Burton v Buglioni was a great fight, so happy Buglioni won. Chisora v Whyte was also fantastic, very typical Hearn that Whyte got the decision, Chisora definitely won.
More annoyingly I had a Buglioni and Chisora double paying a little over 11/1, money stolen from me by Eddie.
BJS is brilliant technically, in a different league to Smith, bigger man than Canelo as well, if Liam Smith makes 9 rounds against Canelo, then BJS makes it all the way and I think its close on the scorecards.
Brook v Spence is Hearn's absolute last result, I think they're both well aware he won't be the same boxer he was before GGG and Khan is a much easier nights work for Kell. Kell knocks Khan out within 7. They don't wanna risk a loss to Spence because then he falls right back down the pecking order and that's likely where he stays, if he beats Khan or gets another big fight, win or lose he's financially fine and can afford to take fights like Spence after.
That being said I think Brook stops Spence early
Who is Khan actually fighting though?
As good as this fight is the Khan fight is still bigger. If Khan gets ironed out one more time I think that fight is gone even for casuals.
I disagree, that fight still sells out any stadium the UK has.
Forgot about that, it was a cracker of a fight! Buglioni far outclassed and Chudinov's shot selection was great but still it turned into a war in parts.
Frank's got a great heart for all his limitations.
Was a great fight, I think Frank will win this weekend as well, I think he's better suited at Light Heavy.
Ah right we agree then.
The only difference being that I think that fight is dead in the water if Khan loses again before here and then. Brook likewise.
That is not a stadium fight if nothing is on the line and both guys with back to back losses or even if one of them does. The credit would have run out on that one.
I disagree with Khan's idea that the fight is always there for him. Even with casuals that fight is on a knife-edge of being relevant. It currently is just about marketable now.
I sort of think it is now or never for that one.
I think one or other will lose if as to their credit they take the toughest available fight if not fighting each other. Then I sincerely doubt that is an easy sell and a viable big event.
If they both come off an average couple wins or a semi decent win, this fight sells out anywhere in England, provided something is on the line, without something on the line, this fight doesn't get made at all because there simply isn't enough money in it.
Brook v Spence is Hearn's absolute last result, I think they're both well aware he won't be the same boxer he was before GGG and Khan is a much easier nights work for Kell. Kell knocks Khan out within 7. They don't wanna risk a loss to Spence because then he falls right back down the pecking order and that's likely where he stays, if he beats Khan or gets another big fight, win or lose he's financially fine and can afford to take fights like Spence after.
90% of comments are so cunty on here.
Biggest killer in men under 50 is suicide. God forbid someone any of you know or loved killed themselves or tried, wouldn't wish them better luck with their next attempt.
Ricky is clean these days, back with his mrs and training his kid in the gym. So f*ck off you pathetic cunts.