Prime Pacquiao DESTROYS current Crawford. Easy work for him.
I don't know. Pacquiao has always had trouble vs elite counter punchers. Look at all Marquez fights, 1st Morales fight, Mayweather. I think if, and it's a big if, Crawford can survive the 1st 4 rounds vs a prime pac, it'll be a close, hard fought win for Pacquiao. Today, however, I see a close but clear 7-5 or 8-4 for Crawford
That's why floyd carefully pick when to fight his opponent, he make sure his opponent isn't in his prime anymore but still he got a gift win against an injured pac.
An injured pac who said he was healed by "god and salt water" lmao.
I bet you're one of those fan girls that said Pacquiao won if you watch in slow motion😂😂
Btw floyd is older than Pacquiao so how exactly did he wait out Pacquiao's prime? Stupid people should stay off the internet.
Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing.
Parker had ppv records prior to AJ's unification . If wilder was not fighting fury, would he be in ppv?
That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee.
He has no choice than to win or kiss good buy to the undisputed.
Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from
"Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?"
to
"Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing."
And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv?
“At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn
Where did you get all this from?
"That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."
Lolx.... All these funny dudes roaming about. Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?
I will support hearn to give him 50/50 if and only if his maiden ppv makes 700+ buys.
Are you saying parker and wilder are equal in terms of drawing power?
That's the more reason he was offered 15mil initially. That's way beyond his drawing power until fury test run came in to the picture.
The number is belts you have is also considered in the sharing formulae.
Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %.
Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker.
Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?
All am saying is both has one belt each as the time Parker unified.
Parker had ppv prior to the AJ fight, no matter how small. At least his fans demanded to see him on ppv.
In the other case, wilder is just debutizing on ppv. All thanks to fury.
So you think a person's drawing power shouldn't be a factor in determining a fighter's purse?
I say get rid of Olympic Boxing. With someone like Rhakinov running AIBA, there's bound to be rigged matches that will undoubtedly muddy the sport of boxing further on the international stage.
You cant explain any of those facts and you know I'm right so the only thing you can do is resort to saying childish things. You sound like one of those gender identity freaks. If I had to guess I'd say your either G or Q hahahahahahaha!
Until you provide sources for those "facts", you're just another crying b i t c h.
Anyone who thinks that wasn't a lucky punch doesn't know what they are talking about. First of all it was plain as day Marquez was using copious amounts of peds for that fight. Working with Victor conte, having horrible disgusting acne all over his body, gaining at least 15 lbs of solid muscle, and never being able to hurt Pacquiao but all of a sudden dropped him then knocked him clean out were all dead giveaways. I've never seen such an obvious case of extreme ped use in boxing. Second of all Pacquiao usually has better defense than that, it was one careless moment where he literally jumped into a vicious knockout punch he didn't see coming by a guy obviously abusing peds. I would consider it not only a lucky punch but a cheap shot of the highest order, scumbags like Marquez can kill people by abusing peds
Translation: waaahhh wahhh waaahhh
Keep crying, baby, and hold that L
We all speculated that Wilded had limitations, Fury confirmed this, aka exposed Wilder. This is coming from a wilder fan. He did nothing more than a 1-2-3 with and occasional 3-2. Still think josh would get slept by Wilder, he tires around round 6 and he won't be able to move away from the thunderous right hand.
Your personal thoughts on the decisiveness of Canelo's victory in the second go are utterly irrelevant to the fact that the decisions in both matches were highly controversial, as evidenced by the deluge of nearly-unavoidable and still persisting controversy that gushed from every corner of the internet in the immediate wake of both fights. Simply accurately conveying that state of affairs, which is objectively true and not up for debate, does not in of itself convey bias on the writer's behalf, nor does it necessarily even reveal his own personal thoughts on the matter, which may in fact align with your own. If you were slightly more intelligent and slightly less of a mindless Canelo dickrider retard, you wouldn't need to have this explained to you.
Clean lil g's spunk from your eyes, it's blinding you.
Fact. Canelo backed up lil g all night.
Fact. Lil g was mostly just throwing out the jab.
Fact. It was only the 2nd time in canelo's career fighting at 160.
Although I will agree with you that ggg-canelo 1 was controversial and i personally had ggg winning that fight, the 2nd fight was a clear victory for canelo, and all the "controversy that gushed from every corner of the internet in the immediate wake of both fights" is a half truth. 1st fight, everyone including canelo fans were questioning the decision. 2nd fight, only lil g fangirls like yourself were crying like b i t c hes about the decision. Must've felt bad. Watching the bully run like a girl. Go suck on a bottle pus.
Promoters sell more when they can call a fight a "title fight" while belt organizations collect sanctioning fees from all the belts they have, and the more the merrier to them.
The problem, once again, lies with the fans. If we want change, we need to speak with our wallets. Boycotting fights with lesser belts promoted as a "title fight" or "championship bout" is how the fans can win. Unfortunately, when a decent fight is scheduled, and an interim belt is at stake, we are no better than cokeheads. We will watch. They will make money. It will happen again.
My god is boxing.
Sorry, but Ortiz is NOT N. 4. never. His resume sux, man. he has to beat somebody to be relevant.
Apologies, I was frustrated when I first replied. Anyways, there's no way Parker is better than Ortiz. When Ortiz beat Jennings, he became the boogeyman of the heavyweight division. Klitschko ducked him and every other relevant Heavyweight wouldn't even mention him until Wilder came along and beat him. After that he suddenly became a bun who hasn't fought anyone. Parker was never the boogeyman of any division. Resumes don't tell the whole story.
I don't see how anyone can give this fight to porter. Just because he was busy. He didn't land shlt. Garcia beat him as easy as Kell brook did.
I guess Garcia tripped and bruised his own face?
Not my fault you're a broke hoe and you can't afford $100 a year for DAZN,...
You piece of shet loser! 🤣
Do you work for dazn? Because this is terrible marketing. I won't be supporting dazn simply because I don't like hearn, but go ahead, keep making an a$$ of yourself by calling everyone who won't get dazn broke.