Comments Thread For: Hearn: If Wilder-Fury Does 1 Million+ Buys, I'll Give Wilder 50-50

If it wasn't going to do 1mill in the US how the **** were they planning on paying Joshua $50m? Wake up stupid. Joshua is big business. Tell me joshua's showtime viewing figures

joshua wilder wouldnt do 1 mil in usa so this is another bs statement from hearn that the unintelligent fanboys gobble up If it wasn't going to do 1mill in the US how the **** were they planning on paying Joshua $50m? Wake up stupid. Joshua is big business.

joshua wilder wouldnt do 1 mil in usa so this is another bs statement from hearn that the unintelligent fanboys gobble up

you cannot help anyone, with anything, alt says dumb shlt..... and then crawls up his own ass lol you clowns are a dime-a-dozen jog on Smiles, sorry I still can't help you mofo.

Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from "Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?" to "Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing." And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv? “At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn Where did you get all this from? "That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee." I think he is from Laligalaliga land

Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %. Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker. Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker? I do but yea, it is fkn bizarre that genius does not Wilder OBVIOUSLY deserves as much as Parker, if not more 35% - 37.5% imho..... considering Parker got 32.5% no way will 40% of the buyers be tuning in to watch Wilder, but he DEFINITELY deserves more than Parker Wilder should jump on 35% for two reasons..... 1) those cvnts are super-difficult to deal with 2) he genuinely believes he can beat Joshua

500K is realistic but Fury doing a MASTERFUL job winning casual fans over here in the US and selling the hell out of this fight, excellent interview with Joe Rogan yesterday which is a huge Podcast with almost 4 Million Subscribers

You prove nobody wrong. You are only exhibiting your fan boy fantasies and leaving reality. I cannot help you on that. you cannot help anyone, with anything, alt says dumb shlt..... and then crawls up his own ass lol you clowns are a dime-a-dozen jog on

Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from "Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?" to "Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing." And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv? “At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn Where did you get all this from? "That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee." Am updating you based on current happenings. Smiles, you and I know that no way wilder gets 50/50 except this fight records at least 700k ppv. What AJ needs to do is keep winning. Somebody else will definitely bring the green belt for undisputed. That's the target. "The Undisputed"

War Beyonce! They will laugh when Wildher gets paid 100 million for Fury fight! War Beyonce! https://i.postimg.cc/FhkG1Srq/iHB8IXP.jpg

Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing. Parker had ppv records prior to AJ's unification . If wilder was not fighting fury, would he be in ppv? That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee. He has no choice than to win or kiss good buy to the undisputed. Huh? Why the change of heart? You went from "Parker had one belt same as wilder, so what's the fuss about 2% increase?" to "Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing." And no, if wilder was not fighting fury, he would not be on ppv. However, do you think parkers ppv fights deserved to be on ppv? “At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair." - Hearn Where did you get all this from? "That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee."

Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %. Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker. Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker? Aside free cable on showtime where he record about 2mil view, he has no record what so ever to base him on a % sharing. Parker had ppv records prior to AJ's unification . If wilder was not fighting fury, would he be in ppv? That aside, all these flat fee, improved offer and % stuffs are still based on assumption that he beats Fury, not just defeating fury but in an impressive way. Otherwise, his stock will nose dive from an alleged 50/50 to a 10mil flat fee. He has no choice than to win or kiss good buy to the undisputed.

That's the more reason he was offered 15mil initially. That's way beyond his drawing power until fury test run came in to the picture. The number is belts you have is also considered in the sharing formulae. Parker had 1 belt and no drawing power for the josh fight. He recieved 32.6 %. Wilder has 1 belt as well and is undeniably a more popular fighter than parker. He recieved a flat fee of 15 million which is 20% of 75 million. That's unjustifiable. He then received a 36 or 37% split (cant find the exact number). That's 4 or 5 percent more than parker. Do you think wilder is only 4 or 5 % more popular than parker?

You prove nobody wrong. You are only exhibiting your fan boy fantasies and leaving reality. I cannot help you on that.

What a retard..... Lmao you said this..... Originally Posted by Laligalaliga You ****. Are you sure you have a brain? That's assuming wilder convincingly KO fury you assz hole. I proved you wrong..... no, it is not " At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair " https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if-wilder-fury-1-million-buys-ill-give-wilder-50-50--133005 it appears that you don't have a brain does everyone who proves you wrong get called a retard ? :lol1:

no, it is not " At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair " https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if-wilder-fury-1-million-buys-ill-give-wilder-50-50--133005 it appears that you don't have a brain What a retard..... Lmao

Unfortunately, in modern sport, its money that drives the majority of it and what happens behind the scenes just leaves the fans in the dark. Now that the Canelo deal just blew away all other sports earnings, it is clear that boxing is now, more than ever, about earning potential. Control, Money, whatever you want to call it, what happens in the ring is completely down to the two fighters, yes. But what happens to make those fights is less about what the fighter wants and more down to the money available to make and promote the fight. There is definitely an argument about whether Wilder has actually earned 50% of a fight with Joshua based on what Wilder has done in his career but that is another argument entirely. Wilder does not deserve 50% and imo..... Wilder is not seriously asking for 50%, and Wilder does not seriously think that he will get 50%..... that was a twitter remark and is obviously just his starting point when Hearn was negotiating with Parker he started by offering them 20%..... but ended up paying them 32.5%..... Wilder knows this

Ok, at least I understand better where you've been coming from, thanks. You are mistaking my factual point, reposted by you above, as an excuse. It's nothing of the sort. I was simply pointing out that the relative situation of both fighters was different from the Parker negotiations. That's why all your subsequent posts about the merits of Parker vs Wilder were so bizarre. you were talking shlt to justify Team Poshua's low-ball, by insinuating that Parker deserved more than Wilder Parker does not deserve more than Wilder, even Eddie Hearn just admitted that when he admitted Wilder deserves 35%

Then why is the clown saying 50/50 or no fight 60/40 if he beats the coke shell of fury ? because they offered him 15mil, and he wants a fair share it is clearly obvious that those twitter comments are not part of any official negotiation he will ask for 50, hoping for 40, knowing he will get 35 how many minutes have you been following this game ?

You ****. Are you sure you have a brain? That's assuming wilder convincingly KO fury you assz hole. no, it is not " At the moment I think a split of 65-35 in AJ’s favour is fair " https://www.boxingscene.com/hearn-if-wilder-fury-1-million-buys-ill-give-wilder-50-50--133005 it appears that you don't have a brain