I wouldn't say hate, but they both don't particularly like each other. It stems back to the amature's and has followed on in the pro's and it will until they fight. I also wouldn't call it a race thing when Kell is black. And you say that Kell cant stop mentioning Amir, just look at how much Khan mentions Mayweather, it's embarrassing.
Amir Khan has only been mentioning Mayweather recently this year Kell has been going on about Khan since 2010
Pacquiao fights are quite exciting
No it sounds like an exciting match-up
A tall Chrs Algeri would be interesting like the Margarito fight.
Also people boycotted Garcia and Salka but that drew about 800K views
That was pretty confusing at first when you said why isn't it not. But to answer your question big fights don't always have to be at the MGM grand. There are it's of good venues for it.
yes a mistake please ignore it
Froch ducked Stevenson after seeing him destroy Bellew.
If he loses to Hopkins that makes him look bad as he always hated Calzaghe and tried to prove he was a better fighter then him especially in trying to beat Kessler in a rematch.
Elite boxer Amir Khan has lost 2 times to B-level opponents in Danny Garcia and Briedis Prescott and was robbed by PED cheat Lamont Peterson's corrupt hometown.
I just thought about the J'Leon loss, although, unlike Khan, it's questionable whether J'Leon is actually elite level. Pacquiao has also lost 3 times to lesser opposition back in the day, which other a-level/elite boxers have lost to opponents who were of a lower level.. I guess Tyson-Douglas is an obvious one?
You seem like such a Khan hater posting this title with him in it in a negative way
you've heard his legs are damaged and he lost blood.
where are you reading this? are you confused and thinking about his carson jones fight in 2012?
explain please.
or is this a joke thread.
No joke thread Brook is the next big thing British Boxing and that he has an extremely damaged leg raises massive concern on his future performance.
Brook having a title makes him a big target in a division that is loaded.
Maaayne, 50 cent was shot like 20 times. He'll be fine dude.
Yeh but 50 Cent is a musician not a sports athlete, he doesn't need his for body music. But the shooting did have a some negative effect in his rapping career and changed his voice tone i believe.
You are either a father yourself, or just a rational guy. Indeed, the love Angel has for his son is beyond measure. I suspect a lot of the guys hating on Angel, are really just lashing out at their dads for never showing 5% the love and commitment Angel has shown for his son.
No he just is a retard so does Ruben show love for his son so does Roger and Floyd show love for Floyd jr.
Angel an idiot racist unlike Ruben and Mayweather they don't bring race into it
the racist stuff is rubbish
someone was posing as froch on some other accountant and posting up racist crap, froch made it clear it was not his account
although froch is an arrogant cunt and his hate for khan makes no sense, he supports haye and other boxers, yet always finds a way to talk bad about khan, went as far as to compare him to david price and audrey harrison
the hate makes no sense,
Well the hate makes no sense I agree with you but racism is a possible theory
Or maybe that's because he and David Haye are friends. They boxed together at the same tournaments growing up.
Why is not watching Khan fights mean "pure hatred"? Wow you are a very sensitive little man. People don't have to watch Khan fight.
Lots of people say Khan lost to Peterson. That's whats in the record books. Froch might not know the full story behind it. He doesn't follow boxing.
There's no point in trying to reason with you cos you've made your simple mind up that Froch is racist
Well Amir Khan was trying to be friendly with Carl Froch. He went ringside to many of his fights to support can't Froch do that.
Well as a british fighter you should give Khan support but he didn't he apparently claims to watch Brtish fighter in world title fights but does not watch Khan the sends a signal that he is a bitter racist.
Well maybe he's just giving an honest opinion. He rates Hatton higher than Khan - why does that have to be racism? He clearly doesn't rate Frank Bruno either who most British people love Bruno.
He turned pro because of Prince Naseem Hamed. Khan wasn't even around at that time so why would that be any reason to try to mask racism? What a ridiculous argument? Why wouldn't he also praise Khan if he wanted to hide his so called racism? :pat:
He has been getting the same credit as Amir Khan for the recent years he has been more popular then Khan.
But when Khan won the title he has said he was boring etc instead of either keeping quiet as he does not watch him.
I heard that he turned pro because of his coach
http://www.menshealth.co.uk/living/men/mh-interview-carl-froch
Well I found this
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ba_UhhyCcAAt8jl.jpg
Also he seems to have a problem with Khan you can sense Froch has absolute hatred for him.