LIFTING WEIGHTS!!! Yay or Nay???

[PunchDrunk]

I posted two different paper from two different source that states the same thing.

Btw the final speed is again 0, unless you keep you hand movin. But I prefer to keep it in stance, or the speed are opposite, since once I move forward, then I move backward. didn't you thought about this?

It's written in the paper man, is basic physics, just go read it.

Your "paper" is about an industrial machine, you ****ing moron. The other one is in Italian and could be about anything.

The final speed of a punch is irrelevant, since you pull back after impact. The punch should be at it's maximal speed when you hit the other guy. Besides, if you acknowledge that the punch goes from speed 0 to a maximal speed, back to 0 before it is retracted, how the hell can you say that it is thrown at a constant speed? Learn to express yourself in English please, you make no sense.

[PunchDrunk]

man, you tried to say that speed and acceleration is the same thing and then you tell other people that they are full of ****?

incredible. Ridicolous.

Acceleration is the increase of speed over time, deceleration is the decrease of speed over time, big ****ing deal.

No, I said they are basically the same thing, because for the purpose of this discussion which is about training, there is no need to differentiate between the two, since athletic movement is all about acceleration to achieve speed. You're focusing on the wrong things here, on purpose I suspect, which makes you a troll.

[mmrooms]

Acceleration is the increase of speed over time, deceleration is the decrease of speed over time, big ****ing deal.

so position speed and acceleration are the same thing? Lol!!! LOLOLOLO

No, I said they are basically the same thing, because for the purpose of this discussion which is about training, there is no need to differentiate between the two, since athletic movement is all about acceleration to achieve speed. You're focusing on the wrong things here, on purpose I suspect, which makes you a troll.

and as I shown you, you were totally wrong. Two different papers from two different researcher shown you that the speed of a punch is cosntant in modulus, but the acceleration vary.

[PunchDrunk]

so position speed and acceleration are the same thing? Lol!!! LOLOLOLO

Learn to read, please.

and as I shown you, you were totally wrong. Two different papers from two different researcher shown you that the speed of a punch is cosntant in modulus, but the acceleration vary.

You've shown nothing, you've posted something in Italian, and a paper on an industrial machine. This is my last response to you troll. **** off and die.

[Danny Gunz]

sorry cause i might be reading what u were saying wrong earlier, but if the punch is at a constant speed then that would make the acceleration 0 and thus making the force of a punch 0 which can not be correct

[mmrooms]

sorry cause i might be reading what u were saying wrong earlier, but if the punch is at a constant speed then that would make the acceleration 0 and thus making the force of a punch 0 which can not be correct

No. A free falling object in the atmosphere after a while (that depends on the object itself) has a costant speed and a acceleration g (9.81 m/s^2).

[mmrooms]

This is my last response to you troll. **** off and die.

It's funny to see that you start to insult people when they post scientific reference. Maybe you are short on arguments, aren't you?


BTW if you lose your chill this easily on a forum, I bet you become a juicy prey on the ring...

[Danny Gunz]

No. A free falling object in the atmosphere after a while (that depends on the object itself) has a costant speed and a acceleration g (9.81 m/s^2).

it cant be constant and accelerating... constant means it is staying at 9.81 m/s and acceleration would mean it is increasing every 9.81 meters every second

a constant speed is 0 acceleration, thats basic physics

again A= final velocity minus initial velocity dived by time... if the object is constant final velocity minus initial velocity is 0

[mmrooms]

a constant speed is 0 acceleration, thats basic physics

Right, this is basic physics, I studied it like when I was 13 yo.


An acceleration means that there's a force acting on an object, not that it is actually increasing its speed.


If you place an object on a table, it's still accelerated by the gravity force, still it's not moving.


If you don't belive me just pick a book of basic physics.

[Danny Gunz]

Right, this is basic physics, I studied it like when I was 13 yo.


An acceleration means that there's a force acting on an object, not that it is actually increasing its speed.


If you place an object on a table, it's still accelerated by the gravity force, still it's not moving.


If you don't belive me just pick a book of basic physics.

Everything you say is making me question how much you know in physics...

If you place an object on a table gravity is acting on it but it is not accelerating, an object at rest can not accelerate

And you are wrong the definition of acceleration is the rate of increasing speed, you are saying a punch is a constant speed, which would make its acceleration 0 and thus make the force 0 which is blatantly wrong