Hopkins vs GGG at 160

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Real King Kong
    Undisputed Champion
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • May 2010
    • 12029
    • 460
    • 24
    • 105,905

    #51
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
    Pavlik was 33-0(30), before the 2nd Taylor fight

    he was a killer... and was totally wrecking fools
    Wrecking who? Zertuche, Miranda? If that was ggg, you’d call him a hype job who beat nothing but bums.

    Comment

    • joseph5620
      undisputed
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 15638
      • 3,089
      • 5,665
      • 71,615

      #52
      Originally posted by Real King Kong
      Taylor was never outstanding. Explain what it was about him that made you think he was “outstanding”? Was it his win over Daniel edouard? HBO tried to force feed him too us, maybe you listened to their narrative. He was basic and had glaring flaws. His jab was pretty good though, even if he did bow and arrow when he threw it.
      Well he did beat Winky Wright who was better than anybody Golovkin's ever beaten.

      Comment

      • Real King Kong
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • May 2010
        • 12029
        • 460
        • 24
        • 105,905

        #53
        Originally posted by joseph5620
        Well he did beat Winky Wright who was better than anybody Golovkin's ever beaten.
        Yea, except he didn’t beat him.

        Comment

        • aboutfkntime
          Undisputed Champion
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 47370
          • 1,631
          • 3,563
          • 391,308

          #54
          Originally posted by Real King Kong
          Taylor was never outstanding. Explain what it was about him that made you think he was “outstanding”? Was it his win over Daniel edouard? HBO tried to force feed him too us, maybe you listened to their narrative. He was basic and had glaring flaws. His jab was pretty good though, even if he did bow and arrow when he threw it.



          he beat Hopkins TWICE you fkn idiot

          Comment

          • joseph5620
            undisputed
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 15638
            • 3,089
            • 5,665
            • 71,615

            #55
            Originally posted by Real King Kong
            Yea, except he didn’t beat him.
            No, except he did in my opinion.

            Comment

            • Real King Kong
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • May 2010
              • 12029
              • 460
              • 24
              • 105,905

              #56
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime
              he beat Hopkins TWICE you fkn idiot
              Lol...you were making the case for Taylor being outstanding to excuse Hopkins losing to him, so Taylor would have had to be “outstanding” before facing Hopkins, no?

              Hopkins was completely flat in those fights...he did almost nothing. Horrible performances by his standard.

              Comment

              • Real King Kong
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • May 2010
                • 12029
                • 460
                • 24
                • 105,905

                #57
                Originally posted by joseph5620
                No, except he did in my opinion.
                Oh...well, you’re opinion. Better let the keepers of the record books know there’s a mistake in there.

                I disliked winky as a fighter very much in those days, but I felt he won. It was like 2 points either way close.

                Comment

                • Boxing-1013
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 6988
                  • 1,098
                  • 2,619
                  • 57,573

                  #58
                  Originally posted by joseph5620
                  Nunn and McCallum were much worse than Golovkin? LOL! You can't get any more ****** than that. Golovkin would have lost to either one. I wouldn't even pick Golovkin to beat Reggie Johnson.
                  What are you talking about. I said Bhop could look great against great fighters, and average against average fighters. Hello 24 rounds and SD UD wins over Sergundo Mercado.

                  I just want everyone to see how little this guy knows about boxing.

                  Bhop never fought Nunn or McCallum. He also never fought a guy named Reggie Johnson. It was Glen Johnson, who I mentioned previously as the best win imo for BHop at MW. If you had ANY idea of what you were talking about, you wouldn't have missed all 3 of those things.

                  You have no idea about anything to do with boxing. You prove that every time you post. You are just a tribal fanboy who views everything on party lines. No rationality, no sense, and you don't even have the sense to know how little you know.

                  Comment

                  • Boxing-1013
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2017
                    • 6988
                    • 1,098
                    • 2,619
                    • 57,573

                    #59
                    Originally posted by joseph5620
                    Nunn and McCallum were much worse than Golovkin? LOL! You can't get any more ****** than that. Golovkin would have lost to either one. I wouldn't even pick Golovkin to beat Reggie Johnson.
                    Btw - I was going to post in that thread of Rev's the other day, then I remembered he had blocked me so I didn't bother.

                    But just so everyone knows - Joe here said that Charlo, of the current guys at 160, would give Hagler the best fight.

                    The same Jermall Charlo who has noticeably struggled and had tight fights with the only 2 decent lefties he has ever faced - Korobov and Trout. But this guy Joe would pick Charlo, out of all the guys at 160, to give the great Hagler his best fight lol. He probably doesn't even know which hand was Hagler's primary one, honest to God I bet he doesn't know lol.

                    Of all the people who have 0 clue on this site, Joe is right up there with the best of them.
                    Last edited by Boxing-1013; 12-14-2020, 11:10 PM.

                    Comment

                    • joseph5620
                      undisputed
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 15638
                      • 3,089
                      • 5,665
                      • 71,615

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Boxing-1013
                      What are you talking about. I said Bhop could look great against great fighters, and average against average fighters. Hello 24 rounds and SD UD wins over Sergundo Mercado.

                      I just want everyone to see how little this guy knows about boxing.

                      Bhop never fought Nunn or McCallum. He also never fought a guy named Reggie Johnson. It was Glen Johnson, who I mentioned previously as the best win imo for BHop at MW. If you had ANY idea of what you were talking about, you wouldn't have missed all 3 of those things.

                      You have no idea about anything to do with boxing. You prove that every time you post. You are just a tribal fanboy who views everything on party lines. No rationality, no sense, and you don't even have the sense to know how little you know.


                      I was talking about James Toney you idiot.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP