Hopkins vs GGG at 160

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • joseph5620
    undisputed
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 15638
    • 3,089
    • 5,665
    • 71,615

    #71
    Originally posted by Boxing-1013
    Yeah and he definitely never fought BHOP! Learn how to read, and think before you post!! You have never done that, but more thinking would do you good. Maybe more reading too.
    You wouldn't know because you've never heard of him.

    Learn that Golovkin does not have a better resume than Pernell Whitaker. You still believe that?

    Comment

    • Jefferson Jazzw
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Nov 2020
      • 101
      • 8
      • 26
      • 2,258

      #72
      Hopkins was such a slick and skilled boxer. I would have enjoyed this fight so much because alot of people would have picked GGG only to see him lose almost every round and not even manage to hurt BHop

      No disrespect to Golovkin, he was a very good boxer himself with elite power. Just was never an elite boxer

      James Toney as a middleweight was also far more skilled then GGG, lights out and BHop would easily beat all the middleweight in the post Hopkins era. Roy Jones would of course too

      Edit

      A better question would be Sergio Martinez vs GGG. Sergio was an elite athlete but could get sloppy at times. He was more hittable then the other boxers i mentioned

      Comment

      • Boxing-1013
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2017
        • 6988
        • 1,098
        • 2,619
        • 57,573

        #73
        Originally posted by joseph5620
        You wouldn't know because you've never heard of him.

        Learn that Golovkin does not have a better resume than Pernell Whitaker. You still believe that?
        I guess if I just proved that I can't read, I would be trying to change the topic as well.

        Comment

        • Boxing-1013
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Sep 2017
          • 6988
          • 1,098
          • 2,619
          • 57,573

          #74
          Originally posted by Jefferson Jazzw
          Hopkins was such a slick and skilled boxer. I would have enjoyed this fight so much because alot of people would have picked GGG only to see him lose almost every round and not even manage to hurt BHop

          No disrespect to Golovkin, he was a very good boxer himself with elite power. Just was never an elite boxer

          James Toney as a middleweight was also far more skilled then GGG, lights out and BHop would easily beat all the middleweight in the post Hopkins era. Roy Jones would of course too

          Edit

          A better question would be Sergio Martinez vs GGG. Sergio was an elite athlete but could get sloppy at times. He was more hittable then the other boxers i mentioned
          Man idk if you can say Bhop was a slick and skilled boxer, and that GGG was average. GGG's am pedigree and jab prove his credentials alone. And Bhop was great and tough but he wasn't really slick and skilled, just smart and unorthodox.

          I think people can revere past eras a bit too much. Happens all over, every sport really

          Comment

          • joseph5620
            undisputed
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Dec 2007
            • 15638
            • 3,089
            • 5,665
            • 71,615

            #75
            Originally posted by Boxing-1013
            I guess if I just proved that I can't read, I would be trying to change the topic as well.
            Thanks for the confirmation that you still believe Golovkin has a better resume than Pernell Whitaker LOL.

            Comment

            • Boxing-1013
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2017
              • 6988
              • 1,098
              • 2,619
              • 57,573

              #76
              Originally posted by joseph5620
              Thanks for the confirmation that you still believe Golovkin has a better resume than Pernell Whitaker. LOL.
              I stand by anything I've said on here. I have the benefit of being the sh.it in real life, so I don't have to live vicariously through other men, who may somewhat look like me.

              I'm also very intelligent, very logical, and analyze things well. Some people are incapable of analysis, or even reading, apparently.

              And you said I'm tribal? I give props to anyone, regardless of race/background. If you can fight, you can fight. That knows no race. And probably half of the greats all-time are black. I have no issue or reservation admitting that.

              I just don't rate guys purely on race. Like 95% of posters on here do. You're just children to me. Some of you can't even fuc.king read.

              Comment

              • joseph5620
                undisputed
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Dec 2007
                • 15638
                • 3,089
                • 5,665
                • 71,615

                #77
                Originally posted by boxing-1013
                i stand by anything i've said on here. i have the benefit of being the sh.it in real life, so i don't have to live vicariously through other men, who may somewhat look like me.

                I'm also very intelligent, very logical, and analyze things well. Some people are incapable of analysis, or even reading, apparently.

                And you said i'm tribal? I give props to anyone, regardless of race/background. If you can fight, you can fight. That knows no race. And probably half of the greats all-time are black. I have no issue or reservation admitting that.

                I just don't rate guys purely on race. Like 95% of posters on here do. You're just children to me. Some of you can't even fuc.king read.
                lmao!!!!!!!

                Comment

                • Boxing-1013
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Sep 2017
                  • 6988
                  • 1,098
                  • 2,619
                  • 57,573

                  #78
                  Originally posted by joseph5620
                  lmao!!!!!!!
                  I'm honestly starting to think you're special needs man. Laughing at odd times. Can't read.

                  Comment

                  • Boxing-1013
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2017
                    • 6988
                    • 1,098
                    • 2,619
                    • 57,573

                    #79
                    Originally posted by joseph5620
                    lmao!!!!!!!
                    I'll make you a deal - if you post a picture of yourself on here, and can prove it is you. I will cashapp you $100.

                    I just want to see how worthless you look in real life. I would really appreciate it lol

                    Comment

                    • joseph5620
                      undisputed
                      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                      • Dec 2007
                      • 15638
                      • 3,089
                      • 5,665
                      • 71,615

                      #80
                      Originally posted by Boxing-1013
                      I'll make you a deal - if you post a picture of yourself on here, and can prove it is you. I will cashapp you $100.

                      I just want to see how worthless you look in real life. I would really appreciate it lol
                      I don't send pictures to men gay boy.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP