your reasoning works like this
how come Jared Anderson has no traction like what Daniel dubois had after a few fights?
therefore frank warren is a better promoter than anderson.
if whyte gets dropped hard, its eddie's fault
if amir khan got walloped by prescott, it was amir khan's fault
this is a biased view bro, forget about it. it's subjective **** and pointless.
it's like arguing who'se a better football agent.
I didnt say eddie did anything special in going to saudi in of itself, i was making a point of frank warren saying 'no fly zone' on saudi whilst keeping quiet about tyson the attention wh0re going there through the wwe. the same he did with the ticket scalping stuff.
for me, frank warren's bitterness and reputation is what makes him a bad promoter.
I look at the young talents eddie's signed in america, the american ones, im certain apart from Haney, you would not even know a single one of them were they with other promoters. I follow most of their fights and stories because im aware of them and like what they're about.
Also, it matters not that some guys like stevenson are hyped more than haney. I saw the way espn pundits fell down in deep worship of tyson fury's giant magical stool once
doesn't mean ****, it's empty hype..
the only thing that matters is who beats who eventually, who makes it.
you can't just artificially pump up boxers too much before they've proved themselves. Besides you missed the point on Haney vs Teofimo/tank.
there are certain points in a boxers career when the hype and attention is on them
when they first come on the scene (like haney last yr)
when they start challenging for and winning world titles.
Haney inbetween those 2 stages, being an 'email' champ n all. Tank's been a champion for a while, knocking guys out.
Fimo has just beaten loma.
if haney was to beat both those guys, who would be the bigger star? if he failed...then it's eddie hearns fault for not hyping them?
makes no sense bro. let them fight, the hype doesnt mean **** right now. way too early.
bob and al have had many names and not done much with them. you can pick and choose any style of argument you want here, focus on one's failures to another's successes. it's all subjective
i liked the cards in eddie's back garden
i enjoyed that more than a big event in america..
i loved the terri harper vs natasha jonas fight
that context and buzz was done eddie hearn fashion...you'd never get that on a frank warren show.
how come Jared Anderson has no traction like what Daniel dubois had after a few fights?
therefore frank warren is a better promoter than anderson.
if whyte gets dropped hard, its eddie's fault
if amir khan got walloped by prescott, it was amir khan's fault
this is a biased view bro, forget about it. it's subjective **** and pointless.
it's like arguing who'se a better football agent.
I didnt say eddie did anything special in going to saudi in of itself, i was making a point of frank warren saying 'no fly zone' on saudi whilst keeping quiet about tyson the attention wh0re going there through the wwe. the same he did with the ticket scalping stuff.
for me, frank warren's bitterness and reputation is what makes him a bad promoter.
I look at the young talents eddie's signed in america, the american ones, im certain apart from Haney, you would not even know a single one of them were they with other promoters. I follow most of their fights and stories because im aware of them and like what they're about.
Also, it matters not that some guys like stevenson are hyped more than haney. I saw the way espn pundits fell down in deep worship of tyson fury's giant magical stool once
doesn't mean ****, it's empty hype..
the only thing that matters is who beats who eventually, who makes it.
you can't just artificially pump up boxers too much before they've proved themselves. Besides you missed the point on Haney vs Teofimo/tank.
there are certain points in a boxers career when the hype and attention is on them
when they first come on the scene (like haney last yr)
when they start challenging for and winning world titles.
Haney inbetween those 2 stages, being an 'email' champ n all. Tank's been a champion for a while, knocking guys out.
Fimo has just beaten loma.
if haney was to beat both those guys, who would be the bigger star? if he failed...then it's eddie hearns fault for not hyping them?
makes no sense bro. let them fight, the hype doesnt mean **** right now. way too early.
bob and al have had many names and not done much with them. you can pick and choose any style of argument you want here, focus on one's failures to another's successes. it's all subjective
i liked the cards in eddie's back garden
i enjoyed that more than a big event in america..
i loved the terri harper vs natasha jonas fight
that context and buzz was done eddie hearn fashion...you'd never get that on a frank warren show.
Comment